Literature DB >> 11332150

Hearing the bad news of a cancer diagnosis: the Australian melanoma patient's perspective.

P E Schofield1, L J Beeney, J F Thompson, P N Butow, M H Tattersall, S M Dunn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the past, recommendations on how to break the bad news of a cancer diagnosis have been based on expert opinion. Recently, consensus-based guidelines for medical practitioners have been developed. The objective of this work is to investigate patient preferences for communication practices and to identify any disparities between these guidelines, patient preferences and patient recollections of hearing their diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A consecutive sample of 131 newly diagnosed melanoma patients were surveyed approximately 4 months after initial diagnosis to document their preferences and recollections of their communication experiences.
RESULTS: Of the 'breaking bad news' recommendations investigated, patients did not strongly endorse the doctor helping tell others of the diagnosis or telling the patient about cancer support services. Very few patients expressed a preference for having another health professional present. One communication feature, the patient feeling confident about getting the best treatment, was endorsed as 'very important' but does not feature in published guidelines. The most notable disparities between guidelines and the reported experiences of patients related to perceived delays in receiving the diagnosis, and having adequate opportunity to ask their clinician questions.
CONCLUSION: Current Australian recommendations on how to communicate a diagnosis of cancer were generally supported by the patients' expressed preferences, but several modifications are proposed. IMPLICATIONS: Suggestions are offered to help overcome the disparities identified between recommendations and patients' preferences when a diagnosis of cancer is being communicated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11332150     DOI: 10.1023/a:1011100524076

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  20 in total

1.  Unmet needs in information flow between breast cancer patients, their spouses, and physicians.

Authors:  E Salminen; J Vire; T Poussa; S Knifsund
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Discussing molecular testing in oncology care: Comparing patient and physician information preferences.

Authors:  Ana P M Pinheiro; Rachel H Pocock; Jeffrey M Switchenko; Margie D Dixon; Walid L Shaib; Suresh S Ramalingam; Rebecca D Pentz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Breaking bad news-what patients want and what they get: evaluating the SPIKES protocol in Germany.

Authors:  C Seifart; M Hofmann; T Bär; J Riera Knorrenschild; U Seifart; W Rief
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 32.976

4.  What patients value when oncologists give news of cancer recurrence: commentary on specific moments in audio-recorded conversations.

Authors:  Anthony L Back; Susan B Trinidad; Elizabeth K Hopley; Robert M Arnold; Walter F Baile; Kelly A Edwards
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2011-02-24

5.  Disclosing a diagnosis of cancer: where and how does it occur?

Authors:  William D Figg; Erika K Smith; Douglas K Price; Bevin C English; Paul W Thurman; Seth M Steinberg; Ezekiel Emanuel
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Oncologists and Breaking Bad News-From the Informed Patients' Point of View. The Evaluation of the SPIKES Protocol Implementation.

Authors:  Paweł Marschollek; Katarzyna Bąkowska; Wojciech Bąkowski; Karol Marschollek; Radosław Tarkowski
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  Cancer information disclosure in different cultural contexts.

Authors:  Kyriaki Mystakidou; Efi Parpa; Eleni Tsilila; Emmanuela Katsouda; Lambros Vlahos
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Resident preparedness in discussing prognosis in patients with advanced lung cancer.

Authors:  Paul Wheatley-Price; Christine Massey; Tony Panzarella; Frances A Shepherd; Joseph Mikhael
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Framework for timing of the discussion about forgoing cancer-specific treatment based on a qualitative study with oncologists.

Authors:  K Laryionava; P Heußner; W Hiddemann; E C Winkler
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-08-30       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Doctors' communication of trust, care, and respect in breast cancer: qualitative study.

Authors:  Emma Burkitt Wright; Christopher Holcombe; Peter Salmon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-03-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.