Literature DB >> 11331731

A comparison of elevated blood lead levels among children living in foster care, their siblings, and the general population.

E K Chung1, D Webb, S Clampet-Lundquist, C Campbell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence of elevated blood lead levels (EBLLs) among children before and after foster care placement, and to compare the prevalence of EBLLs among children in foster care with that of their siblings and the general population.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using administrative databases from the Philadelphia Department of Human Services and the Birth Certificate Registry and the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program at the Philadelphia Department of Public Health. Logistic regression analyses were performed to control for confounding variables, including age, race, gender, and the year, seasonal timing, and source (capillary vs venous) of test.
RESULTS: From June 1992 to May 1997, there were 1824 children in foster care with available blood lead results in the Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Program database. Of these, 519 (28%) had initial lead screening before foster care placement and 654 (36%) after placement. There were 821 siblings and 73 608 children in the general population with available blood lead results. Before entering foster care, children were nearly twice as likely to have EBLLs as their siblings (adjusted odds ratio [OR] = 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.4, 2.0), those in placement (adjusted OR = 1.9; 95% CI = 1.6, 2.2), and the general population (adjusted OR = 1.7; 95% CI = 1.5, 2.0). At the highest point prevalence, 50% of children before placement had lead levels >/=20 microg/dL, and nearly 90% had levels >/=10 microg/dL. For all age categories, siblings of children in foster care placement had a higher prevalence of EBLLs than did the general population. After placement, children in foster care were nearly half as likely as the other groups to have EBLLs.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that children are at high risk for lead poisoning before entering foster care and that placement in foster care may have a beneficial effect on lead exposure. Children before foster care placement are nearly twice as likely to have EBLLs compared with children in foster care placement, the general population, and their siblings. Furthermore, siblings of children in foster care are at high risk for lead poisoning. Children receiving social services in their own homes and children suffering from abuse and neglect should be actively screened for lead poisoning. Greater efforts at preventing lead poisoning among these children must be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11331731     DOI: 10.1542/peds.107.5.e81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  9 in total

1.  Prenatal cocaine exposure: drug and environmental effects at 9 years.

Authors:  Lynn T Singer; Suchitra Nelson; Elizabeth Short; Meeyoung O Min; Barbara Lewis; Sandra Russ; Sonia Minnes
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 4.406

2.  Genetic diversity influences the response of the brain to developmental lead exposure.

Authors:  Jay S Schneider; Keyur Talsania; William Mettil; David W Anderson
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Nutritional status of foster children in the U.S.: Implications for cognitive and behavioral development.

Authors:  Ursula A Tooley; Zeina Makhoul; Philip A Fisher
Journal:  Child Youth Serv Rev       Date:  2016-10-14

4.  Strain specific effects of low level lead exposure on associative learning and memory in rats.

Authors:  Megha Verma; J S Schneider
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2017-07-16       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  An Update on Childhood Lead Poisoning.

Authors:  Marissa Hauptman; Rebecca Bruccoleri; Alan D Woolf
Journal:  Clin Pediatr Emerg Med       Date:  2017-09

6.  Lead Poisoning and Children in Foster Care: Diagnosis and Management Challenges.

Authors:  Marissa Hauptman; Alan D Woolf
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 1.168

7.  Emerging aspects of assessing lead poisoning in childhood.

Authors:  Al Jones
Journal:  Emerg Health Threats J       Date:  2009-05-13

Review 8.  Off to a good start: the influence of pre- and periconceptional exposures, parental fertility, and nutrition on children's health.

Authors:  Robert E Chapin; Wendie A Robbins; Laura A Schieve; Anne M Sweeney; Sonia A Tabacova; Kay M Tomashek
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 9.  Recent developments in low-level lead exposure and intellectual impairment in children.

Authors:  Karin Koller; Terry Brown; Anne Spurgeon; Len Levy
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.