Literature DB >> 11331655

Reassessment of models used to test xenobiotics for oestrogenic potency is overdue.

J L Spearow1, M Barkley.   

Abstract

Product safety bioassays need to include data from animals with susceptible genotypes or the potential for environmental compounds to disrupt reproductive development in hormonally sensitive populations may be greatly underestimated. The continued use of resistant animal models is likely to result in allowable releases of toxic levels of oestrogenic agents that could differentially disrupt reproductive development and function of sensitive genotypes, leading to reproductive failure and loss or extinction of susceptible individuals, populations and species. Rather than ignoring the role of genetic differences in susceptibility to oestrogenic agent-induced carcinogenicity and endocrine disruption, government agencies should support efforts to identify the genetic mechanisms involved in these responses, and to screen for and develop strains of mice and rats which are sensitive to the induction of genotoxicity/carcinogenicity as well as the inhibition of reproductive development and function by oestrogenic agents. Such sensitive strains would be even more optimal for testing chemicals for endocrine disruptor activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11331655     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/16.5.1027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  Neonatal estrogen treatment with β-estradiol 17-cypionate induces in post-pubertal mice inflammation in the ductuli efferentes, epididymis, and vas deferens, but not in the testis, provoking obstructive azoospermia.

Authors:  Munekazu Naito; Shuichi Hirai; Hayato Terayama; Ning Qu; Shogo Hayashi; Naoyuki Hatayama; Hideto Kawamura; Takashi Nakano; Masahiro Itoh
Journal:  Med Mol Morphol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 2.309

Review 2.  Biology and physiology of Calbindin-D9k in female reproductive tissues: involvement of steroids and endocrine disruptors.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Peter C K Leung; Eui-Bae Jeung
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 5.211

Review 3.  Environmental factors in declining human fertility.

Authors:  Niels E Skakkebæk; Rune Lindahl-Jacobsen; Hagai Levine; Anna-Maria Andersson; Niels Jørgensen; Katharina M Main; Øjvind Lidegaard; Lærke Priskorn; Stine A Holmboe; Elvira V Bräuner; Kristian Almstrup; Luiz R Franca; Ariana Znaor; Andreas Kortenkamp; Roger J Hart; Anders Juul
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 47.564

Review 4.  Genetic variation in sensitivity to estrogens and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  D Joseph Jerry; James D Shull; Darryl L Hadsell; Monique Rijnkels; Karen A Dunphy; Sallie S Schneider; Laura N Vandenberg; Prabin Dhangada Majhi; Celia Byrne; Amy Trentham-Dietz
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 2.957

5.  Gene alterations of ovarian cancer cells expressing estrogen receptors by estrogen and bisphenol a using microarray analysis.

Authors:  Kyung-A Hwang; Se-Hyung Park; Bo-Rim Yi; Kyung-Chul Choi
Journal:  Lab Anim Res       Date:  2011-06-22

6.  PCBs exert an estrogenic effect through repression of the Wnt7a signaling pathway in the female reproductive tract.

Authors:  Risheng Ma; David A Sassoon
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Evolution and medicine: the long reach of "Dr. Darwin".

Authors:  Niall Shanks; Rebecca A Pyles
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.464

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.