Literature DB >> 11330963

Extended surgical staging for uterine papillary serous carcinoma: survival outcome of locoregional (Stage I-III) disease.

R E Bristow1, F Asrari, E L Trimble, F J Montz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate survival outcome in patients with locoregional uterine papillary serous carcinoma (UPSC) after extended surgical staging (ESS).
METHODS: All patients diagnosed with FIGO Stage I-III UPSC undergoing ESS (vertical incision, peritoneal cytology, TAH/BSO, omental biopsy, lymph node sampling, peritoneal biopsy) between 1/1/89 and 12/31/98 were identified retrospectively from the tumor registry database. Pathologic features predictive of regional extrauterine spread were evaluated using the log-rank test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves, and median survival determinations were compared using the log-rank test or the proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with locoregional UPSC were identified: FIGO Stage I (n = 11), Stage II (n = 7), and Stage III (n = 8). The median age at diagnosis was 66 years. Preoperative endometrial pathology correctly identified the presence of UPSC in 76.9% of cases. The only pathologic feature found to be predictive of regional extrauterine spread (Stage III) was myometrial invasion > or =50% (P = 0.028). Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) was administered to 6/18 patients with Stage I/II disease and 5/8 patients with Stage III disease. Platinum-based chemotherapy was administered to 5 patients with Stage III disease. All recurrences of Stage I/II disease were located within the pelvis (16.7%). For Stage III disease, all recurrences occurred at distant sites (42.9%). The median follow-up time for surviving patients was 39.0 months (mean = 45.0 months). For all patients, the overall 5-year survival rate was 61.2%. According to FIGO stage, the overall 5-year survival rates were Stage I, 81.8%; Stage II, 64.3%; and Stage III, 31.3%. No significant differences were detected in the risk of death by stage, although there was a trend toward worse survival with Stage III disease: Stage I hazard ratio [HR] = 1.00, Stage II HR = 1.68, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.23-12.03, Stage III HR = 3.63, 95% CI = 0.65-20.12.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with locoregional UPSC following ESS have a more favorable prognosis than previously thought. The additional information provided by ESS facilitates the selection of adjuvant therapy. Whole pelvic RT is recommended for patients with Stage I/II disease. Pathologic Stage III disease portends a significant risk of distant recurrence. For these patients, administration of adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in addition to directed RT. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330963     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  19 in total

1.  Endometrial serous carcinoma (uterine papillary serous carcinoma): precancerous lesions and the theoretical promise of a preventive approach.

Authors:  Oluwole Fadare; Wenxin Zheng
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Molecular alterations of EGFR and PIK3CA in uterine serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Monica Prasad Hayes; Wayne Douglas; Lora Hedrick Ellenson
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Taselisib, a selective inhibitor of PIK3CA, is highly effective on PIK3CA-mutated and HER2/neu amplified uterine serous carcinoma in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  Salvatore Lopez; Carlton L Schwab; Emiliano Cocco; Stefania Bellone; Elena Bonazzoli; Diana P English; Peter E Schwartz; Thomas Rutherford; Roberto Angioli; Alessandro D Santin
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  Concurrent carboplatin/paclitaxel and intravaginal radiation in surgical stage I-II serous endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Kaled M Alektiar; Vicky Makker; Nadeem R Abu-Rustum; Robert A Soslow; Dennis S Chi; Richard R Barakat; Carol A Aghajanian
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-11-20       Impact factor: 5.482

5.  A comparison of uterine papillary serous, clear cell carcinomas, and grade 3 endometrioid corpus cancers using 2009 FIGO staging system.

Authors:  Ha-Jeong Kim; Tae-Joong Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Chel Hun Choi; Jeong-Won Lee; Duk-Soo Bae; Byoung-Gie Kim
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2013-04-05       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 6.  Therapeutic dilemmas in the management of uterine papillary serous carcinoma.

Authors:  Felice D Lackman; Peter S Craighead
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2003-04

7.  Management of women with surgically staged 1 uterine papillary serous cancer.

Authors:  Laurie Elit; Andre Laroche; Lauren Smith; John Mazurka; Francois Moens; Jan Hauspy; Waldo Jimenez
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2011-09-11

8.  An analysis of current treatment practice in uterine papillary serous and clear cell carcinoma at two high volume cancer centers.

Authors:  Tilley Jenkins Vogel; Abhay Knickerbocker; Chirag A Shah; Melissa A Schiff; Christina Isacson; Rochelle L Garcia; Barbara A Goff
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 4.401

9.  HER2 gene amplification and EGFR expression in a large cohort of surgically staged patients with nonendometrioid (type II) endometrial cancer.

Authors:  G E Konecny; L Santos; B Winterhoff; M Hatmal; G L Keeney; A Mariani; M Jones; C Neuper; B Thomas; L Muderspach; D Riehle; H-J Wang; S Dowdy; K C Podratz; M F Press
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Serum amyloid A (SAA): a novel biomarker for uterine serous papillary cancer.

Authors:  E Cocco; S Bellone; K El-Sahwi; M Cargnelutti; F Casagrande; N Buza; F A Tavassoli; E R Siegel; I Visintin; E Ratner; D-A Silasi; M Azodi; P E Schwartz; T J Rutherford; S Pecorelli; A D Santin
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.