Literature DB >> 11330962

Analysis of FIGO Stage IIIc endometrial cancer patients.

D S McMeekin1, D Lashbrook, M Gold, G Johnson, J L Walker, R Mannel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze FIGO Stage IIIc endometrial cancer (EC) patients to better define clinicopathologic associations, patterns of failure, and survival.
METHODS: Charts were abstracted from EC patients with lymph node metastasis from 1989 to 1998. Data on clinicopathologic variables, adjuvant treatment, site of first recurrence, and survival were collected. Associations between variables were tested by chi(2) and Wilcoxon rank sums. Survival analyses were performed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and multiple regression analysis was done by the Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS: From 607 EC patients evaluated, 47 (8%) were identified with FIGO Stage IIIc disease. All 47 underwent hysterectomy and pelvic lymph node (PLN) sampling, and 42/47 had para-aortic lymph node (PALN) sampling. Stage IIIc disease was defined by positive PLN alone in 38%, positive PLN and PALN in 41%, and positive PALN alone in 17%. Twelve of 47 also had positive peritoneal cytology and/or adnexal metastases. Grade III tumors were present in 56% and >50% myometrial invasion in 61%. No association between depth of invasion (DOI) and grade was seen, however. Nearly 1/3 of cases had papillary serous or clear cell histology. Postoperative adjuvant treatment included whole abdominal radiation (36%), pelvic radiation with (19%) and without (17%) extended field, chemotherapy (17%), and oral progestins (11%). The 3-year and 5-year survival estimates for all patients were 77 and 65%, respectively. At a median follow-up of 37 months, 5 patients are alive with disease, and 10 are dead of disease. A distant site of first recurrence was most common (21%), followed by pelvic failure (9%). Only 1 patient has had an abdominal recurrence. Univariate predictors of survival included age, DOI, and extranodal disease, but not grade, histology, or PALN involvement. For the 12 patients with nodal disease and positive cytology and/or adnexa, 3-year survival was 39% versus 93% for those patients without evidence of extranodal disease. In a multivariate analysis only DOI was an independent predictor of survival (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: Once lymph node involvement occurs, the importance of additional extranodal disease increases. Consideration of substaging Stage IIIc patients based on positive adnexa or cytology is supported by the data. The extent which adjuvant treatments contributed to the 77% 3-year survival remains to be defined. The patterns of failure suggest a possible role for combined modalities in future treatments. Copyright 2001 Academic Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330962     DOI: 10.1006/gyno.2001.6157

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  19 in total

1.  Concomitant postoperative radiation and chemotherapy following surgery was associated with improved overall survival in patients with FIGO stages III and IV endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Kentaro Nakayama; Yutaka Nagai; Masako Ishikawa; Yoichi Aoki; Khoji Miyazaki
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Lymphadenectomy should be performed up to the renal vein in patients with intermediate-high risk endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Ismail Alay; Taner Turan; Isin Ureyen; Alper Karalok; Tolga Tasci; Ahmet Ozfuttu; M Faruk Kose; Gokhan Tulunay
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.201

3.  Adjuvant Chemotherapy plus Radiation for Locally Advanced Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Daniela Matei; Virginia Filiaci; Marcus E Randall; David Mutch; Margaret M Steinhoff; Paul A DiSilvestro; Katherine M Moxley; Yong M Kim; Matthew A Powell; David M O'Malley; Nick M Spirtos; William Small; Krishnansu S Tewari; William E Richards; John Nakayama; Ursula A Matulonis; Helen Q Huang; David S Miller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  The role of para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Mariam M AlHilli; Andrea Mariani
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-02-15       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Comparison of FIGO 1988 and 2009 staging systems for endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Melis Gultekin; Ferah Yildiz; Gokhan Ozyigit; Havva Beyaz; Mutlu Hayran; Faruk Kose; Kunter Yuce; Ali Ayhan
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.064

6.  Efficacy of contemporary chemotherapy in stage IIIC endometrial cancer: a histologic dichotomy.

Authors:  Jamie N Bakkum-Gamez; Andrea Mariani; Sean C Dowdy; Amy L Weaver; Michaela E McGree; Janice R Martin; Gary L Keeney; Aminah Jatoi; Bobbie S Gostout; Karl C Podratz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 5.482

7.  Surgical management and postoperative treatment of endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  Jason A Lachance; Christopher J Darus; Laurel W Rice
Journal:  Rev Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008

8.  Prospective assessment of lymphatic dissemination in endometrial cancer: a paradigm shift in surgical staging.

Authors:  Andrea Mariani; Sean C Dowdy; William A Cliby; Bobbie S Gostout; Monica B Jones; Timothy O Wilson; Karl C Podratz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  A phase I study of IV doxorubicin plus intraperitoneal (IP) paclitaxel and IV or IP cisplatin in endometrial cancer patients at high risk for peritoneal failure (GOG 9920): an NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group study.

Authors:  D Scott McMeekin; Michael W Sill; Joan L Walker; Kathleen N Moore; Steven E Waggoner; Premal H Thaker; Tina Rizack; James S Hoffman; Paula M Fracasso
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 5.482

10.  Controversies in the management of endometrial carcinoma: an update.

Authors:  Mohamed K Mehasseb; John A Latimer
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Int       Date:  2012-02-16
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.