Literature DB >> 11330873

The smoothness index, but not the trough-to-peak ratio predicts changes in carotid artery wall thickness during antihypertensive treatment.

D Rizzoni1, M L Muiesan, M Salvetti, M Castellano, G Bettoni, C Monteduro, C Corbellini, E Porteri, D Guelfi, E A Rosei.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It has recently been demonstrated that the smoothness index (SI) (the ratio between the average of the blood pressure changes computed for each hour of the recording and its standard deviation), a new and reproducible measure of the homogeneity of blood pressure reduction by antihypertensive treatment, has evident advantages over trough-to-peak ratio (T/P) in the prediction of the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Therefore we considered it to be worthwhile to compare the ability of SI and T/P to predict changes of the carotid artery intima-media thickness (IMT) during pharmacological treatment in patients with essential hypertension.
METHODS: In 100 patients with essential hypertension, 24 h ambulatory blood pressure and carotid artery IMT were measured after 3 weeks of therapeutic wash-out and after 12 months of antihypertensive treatment (calcium antagonists, diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors or beta-blockers). The homogeneity of the effect of treatment over blood pressure was evaluated by computing T/P and SI.
RESULTS: Twenty-four hour blood pressure was significantly reduced by therapy, while, on average, a small but significant increase in indices of carotid artery wall thickness was observed. However, IMT was clearly reduced in patients with high SI. Statistically significant correlations were observed between changes in indices of carotid artery IMT during therapy and SI. No significant correlation was observed between indices of carotid artery morphology and T/P, basal 24 h blood pressure or changes in blood pressure during therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: SI, but not T/P is the predictor of changes in carotid artery wall thickness. The information provided by SI is independent from basal blood pressure values. For carotid artery morphology, the smoothness of blood pressure reduction is even more important than its absolute change.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330873     DOI: 10.1097/00004872-200104000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


  11 in total

Review 1.  Blood pressure variability: assessment, predictive value, and potential as a therapeutic target.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.369

Review 2.  Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: from old concepts to novel insights.

Authors:  Mehmet Kanbay; Kultigin Turkmen; Tevfik Ecder; Adrian Covic
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Assessment and management of blood-pressure variability.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan E Ochoa; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  Nutraceuticals for blood pressure control in patients with high-normal or grade 1 hypertension.

Authors:  Valentina Trimarco; Claudia Sara Cimmino; Mario Santoro; Gianpiero Pagnano; Maria Virginia Manzi; Anna Piglia; Caterina Anna Giudice; Nicola De Luca; Raffaele Izzo
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2012-09-01

Review 5.  The importance of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients at risk of cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Josep Redon
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-03-27

6.  Italian society of hypertension guidelines for conventional and automated blood pressure measurement in the office, at home and over 24 hours.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Stefano Omboni; Paolo Palatini; Damiano Rizzoni; Grzegorz Bilo; Mariaconsuelo Valentini; Enrico Agabiti Rosei; Giuseppe Mancia
Journal:  High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev       Date:  2013-01-22

7.  Antihypertensive effect of barnidipine 10 mg or amlodipine 5 to 10 mg once daily in treatment-naive patients with essential hypertension: A 24-week, randomized, open-label, pilot study.

Authors:  Giuseppe Rossetti; Samuele Pizzocri; Francesco Brasca; Marta Pozzi; Laura M Beltrami; Giovanni B Bolla; Roberta Famiani; Barbara Caimi; Stefano Omboni; Fabio Magrini; Stefano Carugo
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2008-06

Review 8.  Prognostic value of blood pressure variability and average blood pressure levels in patients with hypertension and diabetes.

Authors:  Gianfranco Parati; Juan Eugenio Ochoa; Paolo Salvi; Carolina Lombardi; Grzegorz Bilo
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 9.  Effect of antihypertensive treatment on 24-h blood pressure variability: pooled individual data analysis of ambulatory blood pressure monitoring studies based on olmesartan mono or combination treatment.

Authors:  Stefano Omboni; Kazuomi Kario; George Bakris; Gianfranco Parati
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.844

10.  Ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy: efficacy of first-line combination perindopril/indapamide therapy.

Authors:  Roland Asmar; Juan Garcia-Puig; Philippe Gosse; Yuri A Karpov; Peter Wilhem De Leeuws; Dieter Magometschniggs; Lajos Matos; Roland Schmieder
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.