Literature DB >> 11330789

Pathophysiology and diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.

B R Line1.   

Abstract

Lower-limb deep venous thrombosis (DVT) affects between 1% to 2% of hospitalized patients. These thrombi disrupt the vascular integrity of the lower limbs and are the source of emboli that kill approximately 200,000 patients each year in the United States. The causes of thrombosis include vessel wall damage, stasis or low flow, and hypercoagulability. These factors favor clot formation by disrupting the balance of the opposing coagulative and fibrinolytic systems. The symptoms and signs of venous thrombosis are caused by obstruction to venous outflow, vascular inflammation, or pulmonary embolization. About 70% of patients referred for clinically suspected venous thrombosis, however, do not have the diagnosis confirmed by objective testing. Among the 30% who have venous thrombosis, about 85% have proximal vein thrombosis, and the remainder have thrombosis confined to the calf. Physicians cannot rely on signs and symptoms to make the diagnosis of DVT and must depend on imaging studies to guide treatment. Patients with proximal vein thrombosis who are inadequately treated have a 47% frequency of recurrent venous thromboembolism over 3 months. In contrast, clinically detectable recurrence occurs in less than 2% of patients with proximal vein thrombosis if an adequate anticoagulant response is achieved. Of the diagnostic procedures for DVT, venography is the only invasive test of proven value, and ultrasonographic (US) studies are the most commonly used noninvasive modaity. Other procedures are occasionally used to diagnose DVT, including impedance plethysmography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. US examinations are noninvasive, they are rapidly obtained, and they can be performed serially. In symptomatic patients, venous US is sensitive and specific for proximal DVT; however, US is insensitive to calf vein thrombosis and to asymptomatic DVT occurring after surgery. Patients with symptoms of recurrent DVT also can present a difficult diagnostic problem. Only about 20% to 30% of these individuals actually have the disease; the rest have symptoms arising from chronic venous insufficiency or from any of the causes of lower extremity pain. After an acute episode, up to 50% of patients have compression ultrasound abnormalities for 6 months that are indistinguishable from the original findings of DVT. Hence, there are a significant number of patients and clinical circumstances in which the diagnosis of DVT is difficult. 99mTc-radiolabeled peptides that target the molecular biology of thrombosis should aid in the management of the disease, particularly in asymptomatic patients at high risk, in patients with recurrent symptoms, in patients with active DVT in the calf and/or pelvis, and in patients with intermediate- or low-probability lung scans.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330789     DOI: 10.1053/snuc.2001.21406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Nucl Med        ISSN: 0001-2998            Impact factor:   4.446


  11 in total

1.  A biomechanical analysis of venous tissue in its normal and post-phlebitic conditions.

Authors:  Kirk C McGilvray; Rajabrata Sarkar; Khanh Nguyen; Christian M Puttlitz
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-09-22       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 2.  Deep vein thrombosis: current status and nanotechnology advances.

Authors:  Aniket S Wadajkar; Sonia Santimano; Maham Rahimi; Baohong Yuan; Subhash Banerjee; Kytai T Nguyen
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 14.227

3.  Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care testing for acute coronary syndromes, heart failure and thromboembolic events in primary care: a cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Yuki Tomonaga; Felix Gutzwiller; Thomas F Lüscher; Walter F Riesen; Markus Hug; Albert Diemand; Matthias Schwenkglenks; Thomas D Szucs
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Intermittent pneumatic compression devices combined with anticoagulants for prevention of symptomatic deep vein thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty: a pilot study.

Authors:  Pengcheng Liu; Junfeng Liu; Liyang Chen; Kuo Xia; Xing Wu
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2017-02-14       Impact factor: 2.423

Review 5.  Neutrophil Extracellular Traps and Its Implications in Inflammation: An Overview.

Authors:  Vidal Delgado-Rizo; Marco A Martínez-Guzmán; Liliana Iñiguez-Gutierrez; Alejandra García-Orozco; Anabell Alvarado-Navarro; Mary Fafutis-Morris
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-02-06       Impact factor: 7.561

6.  Large-scale genetic correlation scanning and causal association between deep vein thrombosis and human blood metabolites.

Authors:  Pan Luo; Jiawen Xu; Shiqiang Cheng; Ke Xu; Wensen Jing; Feng Zhang; Peng Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Phlegmasia cerulea dolens in a patient treated with carboplatin.

Authors:  Martin Söderman; Peter Grimm
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-14

8.  Deep vein thrombosis: validation of a patient-reported leg symptom index.

Authors:  Stacie A Hudgens; David Cella; Carol Ann Caprini; Joseph A Caprini
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Predicting of Venous Thromboembolism for Patients Undergoing Gynecological Surgery.

Authors:  Hong Qu; Zhan Li; Zhenguo Zhai; Chongdong Liu; Shuzhen Wang; Shuli Guo; Zhenyu Zhang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.817

10.  The Correlation Between FGB Promoter Polymorphism and Clotting Function in Patients With Idiopathic Lower Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis.

Authors:  Shengbin Han; Bin Yang; Yaoyu Feng; Lingfeng Zhao; Qun Feng; Hongxi Guan; Donghui Song; Fang Yin; Li Zhuang
Journal:  Clin Appl Thromb Hemost       Date:  2021 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 2.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.