Literature DB >> 11330778

Socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity: the role of social participation and social capital in shaping health related behaviour.

M Lindström1, B S Hanson, P O Ostergren.   

Abstract

Several studies have shown socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity. One explanation may be socioeconomic differences in relevant psychosocial conditions. The Malmö Diet and Cancer Study is a prospective cohort study including inhabitants in Malmö, Sweden. The baseline questionnaire used in this cross-sectional study was completed by the 11,837 participants born 1926-1945 in 1992-1994. Leisure-time physical activity was measured by an item presenting a variety of activities. These activities were aggregated into a summary measure of leisure-time physical activity that takes both the intensity and duration of each specific activity into consideration. The effects of the psychosocial variables on the socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity were calculated in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. The quartile with the lowest degree of leisure-time physical activity was not evenly distributed between the socioeconomic groups. Socioeconomic differences were seen as odds ratios 1.5 for skilled and 1.5 for unskilled male manual workers, compared to the high level non-manual employees. An OR 1.6 was observed for female unskilled manual workers. Self-employed men and female pensioners also had a significantly increased risk of low leisure-time physical activity. Adjustment for age, country of origin and previous/current diseases had no effect on these SES differences. Finally, adjusting for social participation almost completely erased the SES differences. Among the psychosocial variables, social participation was the strongest predictor of low physical activity, and a strong predictor for socioeconomic differences in low leisure-time physical activity. Social participation measures the individual's social activities in, for example political parties and organisations. It therefore seems possible that some of the socioeconomic differences in leisure-time physical activity are due to differing social capital between socioeconomic groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330778     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00153-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  103 in total

1.  Social capital and leisure time physical activity: a population based multilevel analysis in Malmö, Sweden.

Authors:  M Lindström; M Moghaddassi; J Merlo
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  A multilevel approach to youth physical activity research.

Authors:  Susan C Duncan; Terry E Duncan; Lisa A Strycker; Nigel R Chaumeton
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 6.230

3.  Personal, social and environmental determinants of educational inequalities in walking: a multilevel study.

Authors:  Kylie Ball; Anna Timperio; Jo Salmon; Billie Giles-Corti; Rebecca Roberts; David Crawford
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Interaction of area-level socioeconomic status and UV radiation on melanoma occurrence in California.

Authors:  Christina A Clarke; Lisa M Moy; Susan M Swetter; John Zadnick; Myles G Cockburn
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Jemez Pueblo: built and social-cultural environments and health within a rural American Indian community in the Southwest.

Authors:  Nina Wallerstein; Bonnie M Duran; Jolene Aguilar; Lorenda Joe; Felipita Loretto; Anita Toya; Harriet Yepa-Waquie; Randy Padilla; Kevin Shendo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 6.  Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities.

Authors:  Mélanie Levasseur; Lucie Richard; Lise Gauvin; Emilie Raymond
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  The influence of social involvement, neighborhood aesthetics, and community garden participation on fruit and vegetable consumption.

Authors:  Jill S Litt; Mah-J Soobader; Mark S Turbin; James W Hale; Michael Buchenau; Julie A Marshall
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Neighborhood Recreation Facilities and Facility Membership Are Jointly Associated with Objectively Measured Physical Activity.

Authors:  Tanya K Kaufman; Andrew Rundle; Kathryn M Neckerman; Daniel M Sheehan; Gina S Lovasi; Jana A Hirsch
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 3.671

9.  Mother-perceived social capital and children's oral health and use of dental care in the United States.

Authors:  Hiroko Iida; R Gary Rozier
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Does social capital promote physical activity? A population-based study in Japan.

Authors:  Kazumune Ueshima; Takeo Fujiwara; Soshi Takao; Etsuji Suzuki; Toshihide Iwase; Hiroyuki Doi; S V Subramanian; Ichiro Kawachi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.