Literature DB >> 11330746

Constrictive pericarditis associated with Marlex mesh. Two case reports.

R F Chen1, C P Lai.   

Abstract

Two patients were referred to our hospital with constrictive pericarditis approximately 1 year after undergoing mitral valve repair at another institution. Both repairs had included the use of a pericardial substitute, Marlex mesh, to prevent adhesion and to facilitate possible reoperations. Computed tomography and cardiac catheterization were used to establish the diagnosis of constrictive pericarditis. During surgery, dense, thickened fibrous tissue, the result of a Marlex mesh-related reaction, was found tightly adhered to the epicardium in each of the patients. It appeared that the Marlex mesh, which had been inserted to facilitate reoperation, had contributed to the development of constrictive pericarditis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330746      PMCID: PMC101135     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J        ISSN: 0730-2347


  8 in total

1.  Pericardiectomy and coronary artery bypass grafting for constrictive pericarditis after heart surgery.

Authors:  T Sugimoto; K Ogawa; T Asada; N Mukohara; T Higami; H Obo
Journal:  Jpn Circ J       Date:  1996-03

2.  A new look at pericardial substitutes.

Authors:  W H Heydorn; J S Daniel; C E Wade
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  Clinical experience with glutaraldehyde-preserved heterologous pericardium for the closure of the pericardium after open heart surgery.

Authors:  J I Gallo; E Artiñano; C M Duran
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 1.827

4.  Constrictive pericarditis following cardiac surgery.

Authors:  P L Rice; R Pifarré; A Montoya
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1981-05       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  The etiologic spectrum of constrictive pericarditis.

Authors:  J Cameron; S N Oesterle; J C Baldwin; E W Hancock
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 4.749

6.  Long-term evaluation of pericardial substitutes.

Authors:  P J Meus; J A Wernly; C D Campbell; Y Takanashi; R L Pick; Q Zhao-Kun; R L Replogle
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 5.209

7.  Reduction in experimental pericardial adhesions using a hyaluronic acid bioabsorbable membrane.

Authors:  J D Mitchell; R Lee; K Neya; G J Vlahakes
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.191

Review 8.  Constrictive pericarditis: its history and current status.

Authors:  N O Fowler
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.882

  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Diaphragmatic and pericardial reconstruction after surgery for malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Piergiorgio Solli; Jury Brandolini; Alessandro Pardolesi; Marco Nardini; Nicola Lacava; Sergio Forti Parri; Kenji Kawamukai; Barbara Bonfanti; Luca Bertolaccini
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 2.  Surgical Management and Reconstruction of Diaphragm, Pericardium and Chest Wall in Mesothelioma Surgery: A Review.

Authors:  Pietro Bertoglio; Elena Garelli; Jury Brandolini; Kenji Kawamukai; Filippo Antonacci; Sara Ricciardi; Alessandro Cipolli; Barbara Bonfanti; Sergio Nicola Forti Parri; Niccolò Daddi; Giampiero Dolci; Piergiorgio Solli
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 4.241

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.