Literature DB >> 11330638

Morphologically distinct sperm subpopulations defined by Fourier shape descriptors in fresh ejaculates correlate with variation in boar semen quality following cryopreservation.

L M Thurston1, P F Watson, A J Mileham, W V Holt.   

Abstract

This study investigated two hypotheses: 1) that consistent between-boar variation in frozen semen quality exists and is genetically determined, and 2) that morphologically distinct subpopulations of spermatozoa exist within fresh boar ejaculates and that the incidence of these subpopulations is correlated with semen quality following cryopreservation. Five ejaculates were collected from each of 15 boars (5 boars from each of 3 breeds). An objective sperm morphology analyzer used Fourier shape descriptors to describe variation in the morphology of 300 spermatozoa per ejaculate before freezing. Semen was diluted into a commercial freezing buffer (700 mOsm/kg, 3% glycerol) and 5 straws (0.5 mL) per ejaculate were cryopreserved (to -5 degrees C at 6 degrees C/min, then -5 degrees C to -80 degrees C at 40 degrees C/min). Semen was assessed for percentage of motile cells and motility characteristics (with computer-aided sperm analysis), plasma membrane integrity (SYBR-14 positive), and acrosome integrity (fluorescein-labeled peanut agglutinin positive). Consistent between-boar variability was detected for post-thaw sperm motility (P < .01), membrane integrity (P < .01), acrosome integrity (P < .01), curvilinear velocity (P < .01), straight-line velocity (P < .05), beat cross-frequency (P < .05), and amplitude of lateral head displacement (P < .01). Three morphologically distinct subpopulations of spermatozoa, defined by Fourier descriptors, were detected. The proportion of these subpopulations within the fresh ejaculate correlated with semen quality assessments made following cryopreservation. These findings support the hypothesis that consistent interindividual variation in sperm freezability is genetically determined and may relate to processes that occur during spermatogenesis. Subsequent characterization of these genetic differences between "good" and "poor" freezers may ultimately identify biophysical components of the spermatozoa that are essential for successful cryopreservation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11330638

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Androl        ISSN: 0196-3635


  18 in total

Review 1.  Methodological considerations for examining the relationship between sperm morphology and motility.

Authors:  Kristin A Hook; Heidi S Fisher
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 2.609

2.  Sperm cell population dynamics in ram semen during the cryopreservation process.

Authors:  Manuel Ramón; M Dolores Pérez-Guzmán; Pilar Jiménez-Rabadán; Milagros C Esteso; Olga García-Álvarez; Alejandro Maroto-Morales; Luis Anel-López; Ana J Soler; M Rocío Fernández-Santos; J Julián Garde
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Geometric morphometrics of rodent sperm head shape.

Authors:  María Varea Sánchez; Markus Bastir; Eduardo R S Roldan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Intra-ejaculate sperm selection in female zebra finches.

Authors:  N Hemmings; C Bennison; T R Birkhead
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Specific Seminal Plasma Fractions Are Responsible for the Modulation of Sperm-PMN Binding in the Donkey.

Authors:  Jordi Miró; Jaime Catalán; Henar Marín; Iván Yánez-Ortiz; Marc Yeste
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Relationship between Fertility Traits and Kinematics in Clusters of Boar Ejaculates.

Authors:  Vinicio Barquero; Eduardo R S Roldan; Carles Soler; Bernardo Vargas-Leitón; Francisco Sevilla; Marlen Camacho; Anthony Valverde
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2021-06-28

Review 7.  Current status and potential of morphometric sperm analysis.

Authors:  Alejandro Maroto-Morales; Olga García-Álvarez; Manuel Ramón; Felipe Martínez-Pastor; M Rocío Fernández-Santos; A Josefa Soler; José Julián Garde
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Importance of sperm morphology during sperm transport and fertilization in mammals.

Authors:  Francisco A García-Vázquez; Joaquín Gadea; Carmen Matás; William V Holt
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

9.  Morphometric and kinematic sperm subpopulations in split ejaculates of normozoospermic men.

Authors:  Pilar Santolaria; Carles Soler; Pilar Recreo; Teresa Carretero; Araceli Bono; José M Berné; Jesús L Yániz
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

10.  Comparison of different statistical approaches to evaluate morphometric sperm subpopulations in men.

Authors:  Jesús L Yániz; Sandra Vicente-Fiel; Carles Soler; Pilar Recreo; Teresa Carretero; Araceli Bono; José M Berné; Pilar Santolaria
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.285

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.