Literature DB >> 11329522

Are better ratings of the patient-provider relationship associated with higher quality care for depression?

L S Meredith1, M Orlando, N Humphrey, P Camp, C D Sherbourne.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The interpersonal patient-provider relationship (PPR) is an essential part of health care quality, particularly for patients with depression, yet little is known neither about how to measure this relationship nor about its association with quality of care.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate properties of patient rating measures, understand the relation between 2 types of ratings, and determine the association of ratings with quality depression care. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: 1,104 patients with current depressive symptoms and lifetime or 12-month disorder identified through screening 27,332 consecutive primary care visitors in 6 managed care organizations participating in Partners in Care (PIC).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of 18-month data (collected in 1998) after the start of PIC depression quality improvement (QI) interventions (in which clinics were randomized to 1 of 2 QI interventions or usual care). MEASURES: Patient ratings of the interpersonal relationship with the primary care provider and satisfaction with health care, and quality of depression care indicators. ANALYSIS: Factor analysis and multitrait scaling to evaluate the psychometric properties of multiitem constructs and analysis of covariance to evaluate associations between patient ratings and quality.
RESULTS: Patient ratings had high internal consistency and met criteria for discriminant validity tapping unique aspects of care. Patients receiving quality care, especially for medication use, had significantly higher ratings of the interpersonal relationship (by 22% to 27% of a SD) and were more satisfied (by 26% to 34% of a SD) than patients who did not receive quality care.
CONCLUSIONS: Ratings of the interpersonal relationship and satisfaction measure distinct aspects of care and are positively associated with quality care for depression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11329522     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200104000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  26 in total

1.  Enhancing communication between oncologists and patients with a computer-based training program: a randomized trial.

Authors:  James A Tulsky; Robert M Arnold; Stewart C Alexander; Maren K Olsen; Amy S Jeffreys; Keri L Rodriguez; Celette Sugg Skinner; David Farrell; Amy P Abernethy; Kathryn I Pollak
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 25.391

2.  Assessing the utility of consumer surveys for improving the quality of behavioral health care services.

Authors:  J Randy Koch; Alison B Breland; Mary Nash; Karen Cropsey
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.505

3.  A measure of trust in insurers.

Authors:  Susan Dorr Goold; David Fessler; Cheryl A Moyer
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Satisfaction with patient-doctor relationships in inflammatory bowel diseases: examining patient-initiated change of specialist.

Authors:  Daniel R van Langenberg; Jane M Andrews
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Impacts of evidence-based quality improvement on depression in primary care: a randomized experiment.

Authors:  Lisa V Rubenstein; Lisa S Meredith; Louise E Parker; Nancy P Gordon; Scot C Hickey; Carole Oken; Martin L Lee
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Managed care, physician job satisfaction, and the quality of primary care.

Authors:  David Grembowski; David Paschane; Paula Diehr; Wayne Katon; Diane Martin; Donald L Patrick
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Consumer attitudes about opioid addiction treatment: a focus group study in New York City.

Authors:  Nancy L Sohler; Linda Weiss; James E Egan; Carolina M López; Jamie Favaro; Robert Cordero; Chinazo O Cunningham
Journal:  J Opioid Manag       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

8.  Does satisfaction reflect the technical quality of mental health care?

Authors:  Mark J Edlund; Alexander S Young; Fuan Yue Kung; Cathy D Sherbourne; Kenneth B Wells
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Primary care attributes and care for depression among low-income African American women.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Christopher B Forrest; Jeanne Miranda
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

10.  Qualitative study of patients' perceptions of the quality of care for depression in general practice.

Authors:  Linda Gask; Anne Rogers; Dianne Oliver; Carl May; Martin Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.