K Sakhaee1, T Bhuket, B Adams-Huet, D S Rao. 1. University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Center for Mineral Metabolism and Clinical Research, Dallas, TX 75235-8891, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis of data from available published trials comparing the bioavailability of calcium carbonate with that of calcium citrate. DATA SOURCES: The whole set was comprised of 15 studies involving 184 subjects who underwent measurement of calcium absorption from calcium carbonate and calcium citrate. Category A excluded four studies for lack of physiological relevance, use of a mixed preparation with low content of calcium carbonate, or wide variability in results. Category B was comprised of five studies (from Category A) involving 71 subjects who took calcium supplements on an empty stomach. Category C was comprised of six studies (from Category A) involving 65 subjects who took calcium preparations with meals. METHOD: The meta-analysis of calcium absorption data from calcium carbonate and calcium citrate, with calculation of effect size and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS: Calcium absorption from calcium citrate was consistently significantly higher than that from calcium carbonate by 20.0% in the whole set, by 24.0% in Category A, by 27.2% on an empty stomach, and by 21.6% with meals. CONCLUSION: Calcium citrate is better absorbed than calcium carbonate by approximately 22% to 27%, either on an empty stomach or co-administered with meals.
OBJECTIVE: To perform a meta-analysis of data from available published trials comparing the bioavailability of calcium carbonate with that of calcium citrate. DATA SOURCES: The whole set was comprised of 15 studies involving 184 subjects who underwent measurement of calcium absorption from calcium carbonate and calcium citrate. Category A excluded four studies for lack of physiological relevance, use of a mixed preparation with low content of calcium carbonate, or wide variability in results. Category B was comprised of five studies (from Category A) involving 71 subjects who took calcium supplements on an empty stomach. Category C was comprised of six studies (from Category A) involving 65 subjects who took calcium preparations with meals. METHOD: The meta-analysis of calcium absorption data from calcium carbonate and calcium citrate, with calculation of effect size and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS:Calcium absorption from calcium citrate was consistently significantly higher than that from calcium carbonate by 20.0% in the whole set, by 24.0% in Category A, by 27.2% on an empty stomach, and by 21.6% with meals. CONCLUSION:Calcium citrate is better absorbed than calcium carbonate by approximately 22% to 27%, either on an empty stomach or co-administered with meals.
Authors: Geoffrey Roberts; Patrick R Benusiglio; Tanya Bisseling; Daniel Coit; Jeremy L Davis; Sam Grimes; Theresa A Guise; Richard Hardwick; Kirsty Harris; Paul Furman Mansfield; Jeremy Rossaak; Karen Chelcun Schreiber; Peter P Stanich; Vivian E Strong; Pardeep Kaurah Journal: Gastric Cancer Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 7.701
Authors: Marian K Malde; Susanne Bügel; Mette Kristensen; Ketil Malde; Ingvild E Graff; Jan I Pedersen Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) Date: 2010-07-20 Impact factor: 4.169