Literature DB >> 11328584

Different mechanisms mediate the rejection of porcine neurons and endothelial cells transplanted into the rat brain.

S Rémy1, C Canova, V Daguin-Nerrière, C Martin, B Melchior, I Neveu, B Charreau, J P Soulillou, P Brachet.   

Abstract

In order to investigate the early cellular responses mediating xenograft rejection in the brain, porcine aortic endothelial cells (PAEC) or porcine fetal mesencephalic neurons (PNEU) were transplanted into the striatum of LEW.1A rats. PAEC were detected with a specific anti-beta1 integrin antibody, and PNEU with an anti-porcine neurofilament antibody, or an antibody recognizing the NeuN antigen. PAEC grafts were massively infiltrated within 24 h by OX42-positive cells, which may correspond to polymorphonuclear (PMN) cells or macrophages. At that moment, the graft contained numerous cells expressing the inducible isoform of NO-synthase (iNOS). Infiltration by ED1-positive macrophages was effective after three days. The beta1-integrin labeling decreased from that time-point to day 7 post-implantation, and vanished after 11 days. Although some OX8-positive cells were present around the graft as soon as 3 days after transplantation, cells expressing the T-cell receptor (TCR)-beta chain infiltrated the graft after 7 days and their number remained low. A strong, diffuse OX8-and ED1-positive immunoreactive material remained in the scar up to the third week. In striking contrast, PNEU grafts remained poorly infiltrated by OX42- or ED1-positive cells during the first two weeks. A massive infiltration by macrophages and TCRbeta-positive lymphocytes occurred after 3 weeks. Natural killer (NK) cells were more scarce. The inflammation territory enlarged, and blood vessels were overloaded with macrophages or lymphocytes. Nevertheless, the graft contained NeuN-positive nuclei and neurites harbouring the porcine neurofilament protein. Hence, rejection was not completed at this time-point. These results suggest that the rapid rejection of PAEC is mainly driven by macrophages and possibly PMN cells, unlike PNEU, whose rejection is delayed and also involves lymphocytes. Differences in immunogenicity of grafted cells and/or patterns of production of pro-inflammatory cytokines may account for these contrasted rejection kinetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11328584     DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-3089.2001.00076.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Xenotransplantation        ISSN: 0908-665X            Impact factor:   3.907


  9 in total

1.  New lines of GFP transgenic rats relevant for regenerative medicine and gene therapy.

Authors:  S Remy; L Tesson; C Usal; S Menoret; V Bonnamain; V Nerriere-Daguin; J Rossignol; C Boyer; T H Nguyen; P Naveilhan; L Lescaudron; I Anegon
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Transgenic expression of CTLA4-Ig by fetal pig neurons for xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Caroline Martin; Martine Plat; Véronique Nerriére-Daguin; Flora Coulon; Svetlana Uzbekova; Eric Venturi; Françoise Condé; Jean-Michel Hermel; Philippe Hantraye; Laurent Tesson; Ignacio Anegon; Benoit Melchior; Marc Peschanski; Brigitte Le Mauff; Françoise Boeffard; Solène Sergent-Tanguy; Isabelle Neveu; Philippe Naveilhan; Jean-Paul Soulillou; Michel Terqui; Philippe Brachet; Bernard Vanhove
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 3.  Systemic inflammation in xenograft recipients (SIXR): A new paradigm in pig-to-primate xenotransplantation?

Authors:  Mohamed B Ezzelarab; David K C Cooper
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 6.071

4.  Systemic inflammation in xenograft recipients precedes activation of coagulation.

Authors:  Mohamed B Ezzelarab; Burcin Ekser; Agnes Azimzadeh; Chih Che Lin; Yuming Zhao; Rachael Rodriguez; Gabriel J Echeverri; Hayato Iwase; Cassandra Long; Hidetaka Hara; David Ayares; Richard N Pierson; Angus W Thomson; David K Cooper
Journal:  Xenotransplantation       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.907

5.  Neural stem/progenitor cells as a promising candidate for regenerative therapy of the central nervous system.

Authors:  Virginie Bonnamain; Isabelle Neveu; Philippe Naveilhan
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 5.505

6.  Mesenchymal stem cells induce a weak immune response in the rat striatum after allo or xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Julien Rossignol; Cécile Boyer; Reynald Thinard; Séverine Remy; Anne-Sophie Dugast; David Dubayle; Nicolas D Dey; Françoise Boeffard; Joël Delecrin; Dominique Heymann; Bernard Vanhove; Ignacio Anegon; Philippe Naveilhan; Gary L Dunbar; Laurent Lescaudron
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.295

7.  Local control of the host immune response performed with mesenchymal stem cells: perspectives for functional intracerebral xenotransplantation.

Authors:  Xavier Lévêque; Elodie Mathieux; Véronique Nerrière-Daguin; Reynald Thinard; Laetitia Kermarrec; Tony Durand; Thomas Haudebourg; Bernard Vanhove; Laurent Lescaudron; Isabelle Neveu; Philippe Naveilhan
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.310

Review 8.  Concise Review: Innate and Adaptive Immune Recognition of Allogeneic and Xenogeneic Cell Transplants in the Central Nervous System.

Authors:  Chloé J Hoornaert; Debbie Le Blon; Alessandra Quarta; Jasmijn Daans; Herman Goossens; Zwi Berneman; Peter Ponsaerts
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 6.940

Review 9.  Immunological barriers to stem cell therapy in the central nervous system.

Authors:  Gregory E Tullis; Kathleen Spears; Mark D Kirk
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2014-08-05       Impact factor: 5.443

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.