F L Cole1, E M Slocumb, J Muldoon Mastey. 1. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Nursing, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. fcole@son1.nur.uth.tmc.edu
Abstract
AIM: The purpose of this research was to develop an instrument to measure critical care nurses' post-code stress and then to examine the psychometric properties. BACKGROUND: Critical care nurses experience stress from multiple sources. One source of stress may arise from participation in resuscitation attempts and this has been labelled post-code stress; however, no means exist for measuring this source of stress. DESIGN/ METHOD: In phase 1, 47 items were developed and submitted to a panel of experts for content validity. Based on content experts' ratings, 20 items were retained for phase 2 instrument testing. To test the instrument, a convenience sample of critical care nurses was obtained from four institutions in north-eastern United States. Each nurse received the Post-Code Stress Scale and completed it anonymously. A subsample completed the Post-Code Stress Scale a second time to assess stability reliability. The Nursing Stress Scale was also administered to assess construct validity. RESULTS/ FINDINGS: An exploratory principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation suggested five dimensions to post-code stress. These five dimensions accounted for 66% of the variance and indicated that stress arose from feeling discomposed, oppressed, uncertain, burdened and morally conflicted. The Pearson product moment correlation between the Post-Code Stress Scale and the Nursing Stress Scale was 0.46, providing preliminary evidence of construct validity. Internal consistency reliability estimates for the five-factor subscales ranged from 0.57 to 0.77 with only one factor being <0.70. The internal consistency reliability estimate for the final 14 items on the scale was 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument shows promise as a measure of post-code stress based on the evidence obtained in this study; however, further psychometric testing is warranted.
AIM: The purpose of this research was to develop an instrument to measure critical care nurses' post-code stress and then to examine the psychometric properties. BACKGROUND: Critical care nurses experience stress from multiple sources. One source of stress may arise from participation in resuscitation attempts and this has been labelled post-code stress; however, no means exist for measuring this source of stress. DESIGN/ METHOD: In phase 1, 47 items were developed and submitted to a panel of experts for content validity. Based on content experts' ratings, 20 items were retained for phase 2 instrument testing. To test the instrument, a convenience sample of critical care nurses was obtained from four institutions in north-eastern United States. Each nurse received the Post-Code Stress Scale and completed it anonymously. A subsample completed the Post-Code Stress Scale a second time to assess stability reliability. The Nursing Stress Scale was also administered to assess construct validity. RESULTS/ FINDINGS: An exploratory principal components factor analysis with varimax rotation suggested five dimensions to post-code stress. These five dimensions accounted for 66% of the variance and indicated that stress arose from feeling discomposed, oppressed, uncertain, burdened and morally conflicted. The Pearson product moment correlation between the Post-Code Stress Scale and the Nursing Stress Scale was 0.46, providing preliminary evidence of construct validity. Internal consistency reliability estimates for the five-factor subscales ranged from 0.57 to 0.77 with only one factor being <0.70. The internal consistency reliability estimate for the final 14 items on the scale was 0.79. CONCLUSIONS: The instrument shows promise as a measure of post-code stress based on the evidence obtained in this study; however, further psychometric testing is warranted.