Literature DB >> 11327871

Individual determination of the yield of the main UV-induced dimeric pyrimidine photoproducts in DNA suggests a high mutagenicity of CC photolesions.

T Douki1, J Cadet.   

Abstract

Bipyrimidine photoproducts induced in DNA by UVB radiation include cyclobutane dimers, (6-4) photoproducts, and their related Dewar valence isomers. Even though these lesions have been extensively studied, their rate of formation within DNA is still not known for each possible bipyrimidine site (TT, TC, CT, and CC). Using a method based on the coupling of liquid chromatography to mass spectrometry, we determined the distribution of the 12 possible bipyrimidine photoproducts within isolated and cellular DNA. TT and TC were found to be the most photoreactive sequences, whereas lower amounts of damage were produced at CT and CC sites. In addition to this quantitative aspect, sequence effects were observed on the relative yield of (6-4) adducts with respect to cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers. Another interesting result is the lack of formation of Dewar valence isomers in detectable amounts within the DNA of cells exposed to low doses of UVB radiation. The photoproduct distribution obtained does not fully correlate with the UV mutation spectrum. A major striking observation deals with the low yield of cytosine-cytosine photoproducts which are likely to be associated with the UV-specific CC to TT tandem mutation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11327871     DOI: 10.1021/bi0022543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  52 in total

1.  Rotational position of a 5-methylcytosine-containing cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer in a nucleosome greatly affects its deamination rate.

Authors:  Qian Song; Vincent J Cannistraro; John-Stephen Taylor
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Inter-strand photoproducts are produced in high yield within A-DNA exposed to UVC radiation.

Authors:  Thierry Douki; Grégory Laporte; Jean Cadet
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-06-15       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  UV-C irradiation disrupts platelet surface disulfide bonds and activates the platelet integrin alphaIIbbeta3.

Authors:  Robin Verhaar; David W C Dekkers; Iris M De Cuyper; Mark H Ginsberg; Dirk de Korte; Arthur J Verhoeven
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Physiological alteration of the marine bacterium Vibrio angustum S14 exposed to simulated sunlight during growth.

Authors:  Maher Abboudi; Sabine Matallana Surget; Jean-François Rontani; Richard Sempéré; Fabien Joux
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 2.188

5.  The effect of DNA backbone on the triplet mechanism of UV-induced thymine-thymine (6-4) dimer formation.

Authors:  Xingyong Wang; Haibo Yu
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Investigation of the mechanisms of photo-induced formation of cyclobutane dimers of cytosine and 2,4-diaminopyrimidine.

Authors:  Pavlina B Kancheva; Vassil B Delchev
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Carcinogen susceptibility is regulated by genome architecture and predicts cancer mutagenesis.

Authors:  Pablo E García-Nieto; Erin K Schwartz; Devin A King; Jonas Paulsen; Philippe Collas; Rafael E Herrera; Ashby J Morrison
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 11.598

8.  Inactivation of enveloped virus by laser-driven protein aggregation.

Authors:  Shaw-Wei D Tsen; Travis Chapa; Wandy Beatty; Kong-Thon Tsen; Dong Yu; Samuel Achilefu
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.170

9.  The complete genome sequence of Haloferax volcanii DS2, a model archaeon.

Authors:  Amber L Hartman; Cédric Norais; Jonathan H Badger; Stéphane Delmas; Sam Haldenby; Ramana Madupu; Jeffrey Robinson; Hoda Khouri; Qinghu Ren; Todd M Lowe; Julie Maupin-Furlow; Mecky Pohlschroder; Charles Daniels; Friedhelm Pfeiffer; Thorsten Allers; Jonathan A Eisen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  DNA base damage by reactive oxygen species, oxidizing agents, and UV radiation.

Authors:  Jean Cadet; J Richard Wagner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 10.005

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.