Literature DB >> 11327475

Impact of doramectin treatment at the time of feedlot entry on the productivity of yearling steers with natural nematode infections.

D S MacGregor1, D R Yoder, R S Rew.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To measure the reduction in fecal nematode egg counts and productivity impact of treatment of yearling steers with doramectin at entry into the feedlot, compared with control steers treated only with fenthion. ANIMALS: 6,096 crossbred yearling steers with a mean (+/- SD) body weight of 377.0 (+/- 37) kg. PROCEDURE: Steers were implanted with zeranol and alternately separated to fill each of 24 pens. Groups of steers within 12 matched pairs of pens were randomly allocated to treatment with doramectin or no treatment with doramectin for internal nematodes. Fecal samples were collected from approximately every twentieth steer from each pen at day 0 and at reimplant (approx day 60). Each steer was weighed on day 0 and at reimplant and then mean body weights of steers per pen were determined at 120 to 140 days after trial initiation.
RESULTS: Treatment steers had a significantly lower fecal egg count at reimplant than control steers. Treatment steers had a significantly greater mean daily gain during the study, significantly greater feed consumption, significantly lower feed-to-gain ratio, and significantly better quality carcass grades at slaughter. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Under the conditions of our trial, there was a significant fecal egg count reduction response to doramectin treatment, which resulted in significantly improved productivity. Results of economic analysis of return on investment indicated that even with low egg counts in heavy body weight cattle, nematode egg count reduction with doramectin significantly improved returns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11327475     DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.622

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Vet Res        ISSN: 0002-9645            Impact factor:   1.156


  3 in total

Review 1.  The epidemiology of bovine respiratory disease: what is the evidence for preventive measures?

Authors:  Jared D Taylor; Robert W Fulton; Terry W Lehenbauer; Douglas L Step; Anthony W Confer
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 1.008

2.  Economic assessments from experimental research trials of feedlot cattle health and performance: a scoping review.

Authors:  Andrea L Dixon; Christy J Hanthorn; Dustin L Pendell; Natalia Cernicchiaro; David G Renter
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2022-06-06

3.  Where's the risk? Landscape epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasitism in Alberta beef cattle.

Authors:  Melissa A Beck; Douglas D Colwell; Cameron P Goater; Stefan W Kienzle
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.876

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.