Literature DB >> 11327192

Nonresponse in a follow-up to a representative telephone survey of adult drinkers.

T C Wild1, J Cunningham, E Adlaf.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Examined predictors of nonresponse among respondents who agreed to receive a follow-up questionnaire on alcohol use after participating in a representative telephone survey, and among respondents who did and did not return the follow-up questionnaire.
METHOD: A total of 2,072 (52.2% female) respondents to a representative monthly telephone survey were assessed on sociodemographic variables and alcohol use. Respondents were asked whether they would be willing to fill out an additional mailed questionnaire on alcohol use and attitudes toward drinking. Almost half (n = 956; 46%) of respondents agreed to participate in the follow-up survey; 430 (45%) of those individuals completed and returned the questionnaire.
RESULTS: Agreement to receive the follow-up questionnaire was unrelated to alcohol use. Regarding gender, men were 1.42 times more likely than women to exhibit nonresponse in returning the follow-up questionnaire (95% CI: 1.08-1.42). After adjusting for the impact of demographic factors, respondents who consumed alcohol at least once per week were 1.43 times more likely than respondents who drank less frequently to exhibit nonresponse in returning the questionnaire (95% CI: 1.05-1.93). Respondents who consumed five or more standard drinks at least once per week were 1.83 times more likely to exhibit nonresponse in returning the questionnaire, compared with respondents who engaged in heavy drinking less frequently (95% CI: 1.15-2.92).
CONCLUSIONS: Mailout questionnaires following a representative telephone survey may bias samples toward obtaining fewer men, fewer weekly drinkers and fewer heavier drinkers. Although the magnitude of these biases were relatively small, epidemiological studies on alcohol use may wish to oversample men and heavier drinkers in follow-up studies recruiting from population surveys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11327192     DOI: 10.15288/jsa.2001.62.257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Stud Alcohol        ISSN: 0096-882X


  20 in total

1.  Sex Differences in Willingness to Participate in Research Based on Study Risk Level Among a Community Sample of African Americans in North Central Florida.

Authors:  Ayodeji Otufowora; Yiyang Liu; Henry Young; Kathleen L Egan; Deepthi S Varma; Catherine W Striley; Linda B Cottler
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2021-02

2.  A survey of the pain experienced by males and females with Fabry disease.

Authors:  Andrea L Gibas; Regan Klatt; Jack Johnson; Joe T R Clarke; Joel Katz
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.037

3.  A modified random walk door-to-door recruitment strategy for collecting social and biological data relating to mental health, substance use, addiction, and violence problems in a Canadian community.

Authors:  Andrea Flynn; Paul F Tremblay; Jürgen Rehm; Samantha Wells
Journal:  Int J Alcohol Drug Res       Date:  2013-06-09

4.  Nonresponse bias in survey estimates of alcohol consumption and its association with harm.

Authors:  Deborah A Dawson; Risë B Goldstein; Roger P Pickering; Bridget F Grant
Journal:  J Stud Alcohol Drugs       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.582

5.  Risk factors for mental disorder among university students in Australia: findings from a web-based cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  David Said; Kypros Kypri; Jenny Bowman
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 4.328

6.  Examining neighborhood poverty-based disparities in HIV/STI prevalence: an analysis of Add Health data.

Authors:  Andrew R Zullo; Joëlla W Adams; Jason R Gantenberg; Brandon D L Marshall; Chanelle J Howe
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.797

7.  The HUNT study: participation is associated with survival and depends on socioeconomic status, diseases and symptoms.

Authors:  Arnulf Langhammer; Steinar Krokstad; Pål Romundstad; Jon Heggland; Jostein Holmen
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-09-14       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  Barriers to participation in a patient satisfaction survey: who are we missing?

Authors:  Angèle Gayet-Ageron; Thomas Agoritsas; Laura Schiesari; Véronique Kolly; Thomas V Perneger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The effect of low survey response rates on estimates of alcohol consumption in a general population survey.

Authors:  Jessica Meiklejohn; Jennie Connor; Kypros Kypri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A randomized controlled trial of an internet-based intervention for alcohol abusers.

Authors:  John A Cunningham; T Cameron Wild; Joanne Cordingley; Trevor van Mierlo; Keith Humphreys
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.526

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.