Literature DB >> 11327132

A new method of laparoscopic cholecystectomy using three trocars combined with suture retraction of gallbladder.

S Endo1, S Souda, R Nezu, Y Yoshikawa, J Hashimoto, T Mori, F Uchikoshi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Since the establishment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for benign gallbladder lesions, the four-trocar method has been the standard procedure. However, the fourth trocar generally is used just for fundic retraction of the gallbladder. We have developed a three-trocar method for LC and performed it in 132 patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: After the creation of the pneumoperitoneum, the first 10-mm trocar sheath was inserted in the subumbilicus for the endoscope, the second 5-mm trocar in the epigastric paramedian point for the working port, and the third 5-mm trocar in the subcostal area for grasping forceps. Monofilament nylon with a straight needle was inserted through the right 7th intercostal space in the anterior axillary line, and the seromuscular layer of the gallbladder fundus was punctured and retracted toward the anterior abdominal wall. After that, usual cholecystectomy was performed.
RESULTS: Among the 132 patients who underwent the three-trocar method, 10 cases (8%) needed a fourth trocar. No patient was converted to open cholecystectomy. There were no significant differences in the operating time, the length of hospital stay after the operation, or the use of analgesics between the three-trocar and the four-trocar methods. No major complication was recognized.
CONCLUSION: This method also has cosmetic advantages. Therefore, we believe this method might be recommended for LC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11327132     DOI: 10.1089/109264201750162310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  10 in total

1.  Is there still any role for minilaparoscopic-cholecystectomy? A general surgeons' last five years experience over 932 cases.

Authors:  Ferdinando Agresta; Natalino Bedin
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2011-11-11

2.  Magnetically anchored cautery dissector improves triangulation, depth perception, and workload during single-site laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Nabeel A Arain; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Deborah C Hogg; Richard Bergs; Raul Fernandez; Daniel J Scott
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-06-29       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Is fourth port really required in laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Mushtaq Chalkoo; Shahnawaz Ahangar; Abdul Munnon Durrani
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2010-11-18       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Laparoscopic resection of an abdominal wall desmoid using a modified suture traction technique: the "marionette trick".

Authors:  G La Greca; V Randazzo; F Barbagallo; A Di Stefano; L Greco; D Rapisarda; D Russello
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Two-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy with modified suture retraction of the fundus: A practical approach.

Authors:  Ming G Tian; Pei J Zhang; Y Yang; Fan J Shang; J Zhan
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.407

6.  Feasibility and Safety of Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Compared to Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Mohd Yunus Shah; Umeshraj Somasundaram; TRVRaju Wilkinson; Nitin Wasnik
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-11-29

7.  Preemptive Intravenous Nalbuphine for the Treatment of Post-Operative Visceral Pain: A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Xiaofen Liu; Jun Hu; Xianwen Hu; Rui Li; Yun Li; Gordon Wong; Ye Zhang
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2021-06-04

8.  The outcomes of SILS cholecystectomy in comparison with classic four-trocar laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Waldemar Kurpiewski; Wiesław Pesta; Marek Kowalczyk; Leszek Głowacki; Wit Juśkiewicz; Rafał Szynkarczuk; Jadwiga Snarska; Edward Stanowski
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 1.195

9.  Three-port versus standard four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial in a community-based teaching hospital in eastern Nepal.

Authors:  Manoj Kumar; Chandra Shekhar Agrawal; Rakesh Kumar Gupta
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

10.  Three-port versus four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acute and chronic cholecystitis.

Authors:  Dhafir Al-Azawi; Nariman Houssein; Abu Bakir Rayis; Donal McMahon; Dermot J Hehir
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.