Literature DB >> 11325118

Psychoacoustic correlates of individual noise sensitivity.

W Ellermeier1, M Eigenstetter, K Zimmer.   

Abstract

In environmental noise surveys, self-reported noise sensitivity, a stable personality trait covering attitudes toward a wide range of environmental sounds, is a major predictor of individual noise-annoyance reactions. Its relationship to basic measures of auditory functioning, however, has not been systematically explored. Therefore, in the present investigation, a sample of 61 unselected listeners was subjected to a battery of psychoacoustic procedures ranging from threshold determinations to loudness scaling tasks. No significant differences in absolute thresholds, intensity discrimination, simple auditory reaction time, or power-function exponents for loudness emerged, when the sample was split along the median into two groups of "low" vs "high" noise sensitivity on the basis of scores obtained from a psychometrically evaluated questionnaire [Zimmer and Ellermeier, Diagnostica 44, 11-20 (1998)]. Small, but systematic differences were found in verbal loudness estimates, and in ratings of the unpleasantness of natural sounds, thus suggesting that self-reported noise sensitivity captures evaluative rather than sensory aspects of auditory processing.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11325118     DOI: 10.1121/1.1350402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  21 in total

1.  Mental chronometry and individual differences: modeling reliabilities and correlations of reaction time means and effect sizes.

Authors:  Jeff Miller; Rolf Ulrich
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-10

2.  Calculating annoyance: an option to proof efficacy in ENT treatment of snoring?

Authors:  René Fischer; Thomas S Kuehnel; Anne-Kathrin Merz; Tobias Ettl; Michael Herzog; Christian Rohrmeier
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Are subjective assessments of snoring sounds reliable?

Authors:  Christian Rohrmeier; René Fischer; Anne-Kathrin Merz; Tobias Ettl; Michael Herzog; Thomas S Kuehnel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-02       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 4.  A review of decreased sound tolerance in autism: Definitions, phenomenology, and potential mechanisms.

Authors:  Zachary J Williams; Jason L He; Carissa J Cascio; Tiffany G Woynaroski
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-12-04       Impact factor: 8.989

5.  City dweller responses to multiple stressors intruding into their homes: noise, light, odour, and vibration.

Authors:  Eja Pedersen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  The association of noise sensitivity with music listening, training, and aptitude.

Authors:  Marina Kliuchko; Marja Heinonen-Guzejev; Lucia Monacis; Benjamin P Gold; Kauko V Heikkilä; Vittoria Spinosa; Mari Tervaniemi; Elvira Brattico
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 0.867

7.  A window into the brain mechanisms associated with noise sensitivity.

Authors:  Marina Kliuchko; Marja Heinonen-Guzejev; Peter Vuust; Mari Tervaniemi; Elvira Brattico
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Influence of social and behavioural characteristics of users on their evaluation of subjective loudness and acoustic comfort in shopping malls.

Authors:  Qi Meng; Jian Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Lung Sounds in Children before and after Respiratory Physical Therapy for Right Middle Lobe Atelectasis.

Authors:  Satoshi Adachi; Hiroshi Nakano; Hiroshi Odajima; Chikako Motomura; Yukiko Yoshioka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characteristics of hyperacusis in the general population.

Authors:  Johan Paulin; Linus Andersson; Steven Nordin
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 0.867

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.