Literature DB >> 11324833

Nurse practitioner preferences for distance education methods related to learning style, course content, and achievement.

M A Andrusyszyn1, C E Cragg, J Humbert.   

Abstract

The relationships among multiple distance delivery methods, preferred learning style, content, and achievement was sought for primary care nurse practitioner students. A researcher-designed questionnaire was completed by 86 (71%) participants, while 6 engaged in follow-up interviews. The results of the study included: participants preferred learning by "considering the big picture"; "setting own learning plans"; and "focusing on concrete examples." Several positive associations were found: learning on own with learning by reading, and setting own learning plans; small group with learning through discussion; large group with learning new things through hearing and with having learning plans set by others. The most preferred method was print-based material and the least preferred method was audio tape. The most suited method for content included video teleconferencing for counseling, political action, and transcultural issues; and video tape for physical assessment. Convenience, self-direction, and timing of learning were more important than delivery method or learning style. Preferred order of learning was reading, discussing, observing, doing, and reflecting. Recommended considerations when designing distance courses include a mix of delivery methods, specific content, outcomes, learner characteristics, and state of technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11324833     DOI: 10.3928/0148-4834-20010401-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nurs Educ        ISSN: 0148-4834            Impact factor:   1.726


  3 in total

1.  Bridging the distance: a prospective tele-oncology study in Northern Norway.

Authors:  Tom Donnem; Bente Ervik; Kathrine Magnussen; Sigve Andersen; Doris Pastow; Sissel Andreassen; Tone Nørstad; Nina Helbekkmo; Roy M Bremnes; Tone Nordoy
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Enhancing access to cancer education for rural healthcare providers via telehealth.

Authors:  Ardith Z Doorenbos; Anjana Kundu; Linda H Eaton; George Demiris; Emily A Haozous; Cara Towle; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Leveraging Providers' Preferences to Customize Instructional Content in Information and Communications Technology-Based Training Interventions: Retrospective Analysis of a Mobile Phone-Based Intervention in India.

Authors:  Hanu Tyagi; Manisha Sabharwal; Nishi Dixit; Arnab Pal; Sarang Deo
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.773

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.