RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical dose of gadoteridol (ProHance, Bracco-Byk Gulden) to use for the assessment of blood-brain barrier breakdown on low-field magnetic resonance (MR) scanners that corresponds to a standard dose of gadoteridol on high-field MR scanners. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out at four centers. A total of 138 patients with suspected or known brain diseases underwent a routine head scan comprising precontrast T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences on a 1.5-T MR scanner. After administration of a standard dose of 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol, the T1-weighted scan was repeated after a delay of 15 to 20 minutes. For continuing the examination on a 0.2-T MR scanner (Magnetom OPEN, Siemens), a standard-dose T1 spin-echo sequence was started within 30 to 50 minutes of the first injection. Then two additional T1-weighted low-field sequences were each started 5 minutes after two additional doses of 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol. Eighty patients with enhancing lesions underwent an intraindividual comparison. Evaluation of the overall numbers of lesions detected and of lesion size and character was performed on-site as well as off-site by two independent readers. RESULTS: The single-dose, low-field sequence detected significantly fewer enhancing lesions (80/95 lesions; P < 0.05), particularly metastases and infarctions, than did the standard-dose, high-field sequence. No statistically relevant differences (reader 1: P = 1; reader 2: P = 0.8) were found between the double- and triple-dose, low-field sequences and the standard-dose, high-field sequence. Primary brain tumors were detected by all postcontrast sequences irrespective of the dose. CONCLUSIONS: At low field, the clinically equivalent dose to 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol at high field is 0.2 mmol/kg. A dose of 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol is less effective and cannot be recommended for use on extremely low-field scanners.
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To determine the clinical dose of gadoteridol (ProHance, Bracco-Byk Gulden) to use for the assessment of blood-brain barrier breakdown on low-field magnetic resonance (MR) scanners that corresponds to a standard dose of gadoteridol on high-field MR scanners. METHODS: This prospective study was carried out at four centers. A total of 138 patients with suspected or known brain diseases underwent a routine head scan comprising precontrast T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and T1-weighted spin-echo sequences on a 1.5-T MR scanner. After administration of a standard dose of 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol, the T1-weighted scan was repeated after a delay of 15 to 20 minutes. For continuing the examination on a 0.2-T MR scanner (Magnetom OPEN, Siemens), a standard-dose T1 spin-echo sequence was started within 30 to 50 minutes of the first injection. Then two additional T1-weighted low-field sequences were each started 5 minutes after two additional doses of 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol. Eighty patients with enhancing lesions underwent an intraindividual comparison. Evaluation of the overall numbers of lesions detected and of lesion size and character was performed on-site as well as off-site by two independent readers. RESULTS: The single-dose, low-field sequence detected significantly fewer enhancing lesions (80/95 lesions; P < 0.05), particularly metastases and infarctions, than did the standard-dose, high-field sequence. No statistically relevant differences (reader 1: P = 1; reader 2: P = 0.8) were found between the double- and triple-dose, low-field sequences and the standard-dose, high-field sequence. Primary brain tumors were detected by all postcontrast sequences irrespective of the dose. CONCLUSIONS: At low field, the clinically equivalent dose to 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol at high field is 0.2 mmol/kg. A dose of 0.1 mmol/kg gadoteridol is less effective and cannot be recommended for use on extremely low-field scanners.
Authors: Marco Essig; Martin Rohrer; Frederik Giesel; Jochen Tüttenberg; Marc-André Weber; Hendrik Michaely; Lars Gerigk; Matthias Voth Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2009-08-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Raphaela Goldbach-Mansky; Natalie J Dailey; Scott W Canna; Ana Gelabert; Janet Jones; Benjamin I Rubin; H Jeffrey Kim; Carmen Brewer; Christopher Zalewski; Edythe Wiggs; Suvimol Hill; Maria L Turner; Barbara I Karp; Ivona Aksentijevich; Frank Pucino; Scott R Penzak; Margje H Haverkamp; Leonard Stein; Barbara S Adams; Terry L Moore; Robert C Fuhlbrigge; Bracha Shaham; James N Jarvis; Kathleen O'Neil; Richard K Vehe; Laurie O Beitz; Gregory Gardner; William P Hannan; Robert W Warren; William Horn; Joe L Cole; Scott M Paul; Philip N Hawkins; Tuyet Hang Pham; Christopher Snyder; Robert A Wesley; Steven C Hoffmann; Steven M Holland; John A Butman; Daniel L Kastner Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-08-10 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Iris-Melanie Noebauer-Huhmann; P Szomolanyi; C Kronnerwetter; G Widhalm; M Weber; S Nemec; V Juras; M E Ladd; D Prayer; S Trattnig Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-09-07 Impact factor: 5.315