Literature DB >> 11322418

Trends in contact lens-related corneal ulcers.

T Rattanatam1, W J Heng, C J Rapuano, P R Laibson, E J Cohen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To identify changes in number of contact lens-related corneal ulcers per year and the type of contact lenses involved.
METHODS: Charts of 299 patients with corneal ulcers seen at the Cornea Service of Wills Eye Hospital from January 1, 1996, to June 30, 1999, were retrospectively reviewed. A corneal ulcer was defined as an infiltrate that was treated at least hourly with topical fortified antibiotics or fluoroquinolones.
RESULTS: Of these 299 cases, 37 (12.4%) were related to contact lens use. Contact lens-related ulcers accounted for 10.7% of all corneal ulcers in 1996, 15.3% in 1997, 8.6% in 1998, and 18.2% in the first 6 months of 1999. The contact lenses most commonly associated with ulcers were conventional soft daily-wear contact lenses (33%). There were similar numbers of ulcers associated with extended wear (n = 16) and daily wear (n = 17) of soft contact lenses. In addition, the number of cases associated with conventional (n = 17) and disposable/frequent replacement (n = 16) lenses were similar. Corneal cultures were performed in 15 (40.5%) cases and were positive in 8. There has been a significant decrease in the number of contact lens-related ulcers treated at our institution compared with previous years (1988-1999, p < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: The number of contact lens-related corneal ulcers in the past 4 years was significantly fewer than previous years at our institution. A similar number of ulcers were associated with conventional and disposable/frequent replacement lenses despite the commercial preponderance of the latter type of lenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11322418     DOI: 10.1097/00003226-200104000-00010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cornea        ISSN: 0277-3740            Impact factor:   2.651


  16 in total

1.  Microbial keratitis.

Authors:  B H Jeng; S D McLeod
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Efficacy of VIP as Treatment for Bacteria-Induced Keratitis Against Multiple Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strains.

Authors:  Thomas W Carion; Cody R McWhirter; Daiyajot K Grewal; Elizabeth A Berger
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Contact Lens Induced Corneal Ulcer Management in a Tertiary Eye Unit in Oman - A descriptive study.

Authors:  Rikin Shah; Manali Shah; Rajiv Khandekar; Abdulatif Al-Raisi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2008-11

4.  MRP8/14 enhances corneal susceptibility to Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection by amplifying inflammatory responses.

Authors:  Qiuchan Deng; Mingxia Sun; Kun Yang; Min Zhu; Kang Chen; Jin Yuan; Minhao Wu; Xi Huang
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Effects of VIP on corneal reconstitution and homeostasis following Pseudomonas aeruginosa induced keratitis.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Berger; Kerry S Vistisen; Ronald P Barrett; Linda D Hazlett
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-11-01       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Role of the Fas pathway in Pseudomonas aeruginosa keratitis.

Authors:  Zimei Zhou; Minhao Wu; Ronald P Barrett; Sharon A McClellan; Yunfan Zhang; Linda D Hazlett
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-12-17       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Microbial keratitis in kingdom of bahrain: clinical and microbiology study.

Authors:  Nada Al-Yousuf
Journal:  Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009-01

Review 8.  IL-10 function, regulation, and in bacterial keratitis.

Authors:  Linda D Hazlett; Xiaoyu Jiang; Sharon A McClellan
Journal:  J Ocul Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Immunoregulatory role of 15-lipoxygenase in the pathogenesis of bacterial keratitis.

Authors:  Thomas W Carion; Matthew Greenwood; Abdul Shukkur Ebrahim; Andrew Jerome; Susmit Suvas; Karsten Gronert; Elizabeth A Berger
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Factors influencing bacterial adhesion to contact lenses.

Authors:  Debarun Dutta; Nerida Cole; Mark Willcox
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.