Literature DB >> 11320464

The evaluation of a precordial ECG BELT: technologist satisfaction and accuracy of recording.

S J Bell1, J Clifton, J Pease, J C Greenfield, S Leggett, C Maynard, D O'Hara, S Zhou, R H Selvester, G S Wagner.   

Abstract

The standard method for performing electrocardiogram (ECG) recordings presents a challenge to technicians because of the need to correctly position the individual precordial electrodes according to 6 bony thoracic landmarks. A proposed new method using a 6-lead ECG BELT for precordial application was compared to the standard method to determine the level of agreement among automated interpretations. A comparison of automated interpretations from repeat standard recordings served as the control. Results indicate that BELT and standard automated interpretations disagreed significantly more frequently than repeat standard recording automated interpretations of the cardiac rhythm. The BELT's most obvious weakness was the inability to obtain a recording with a stable ECG baseline, triggering automated detection of "baseline artifact or wander," and requiring a repeat recording. These findings suggest that the ECG BELT is not adequate for clinical application in its current form.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11320464     DOI: 10.1054/jelc.2001.23773

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Electrocardiol        ISSN: 0022-0736            Impact factor:   1.438


  2 in total

1.  Modified precordial lead ECG SafOne on electrocardiography recordings.

Authors:  Wan Nishfa Dewi; Safri Safri; Iswadi Hasyim Rosma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 4.996

2.  The V-Quick patch versus the standard 12-lead ECG system: time is the essence.

Authors:  F Lateef; A Annathurai; T T Loh
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-15
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.