Literature DB >> 11319141

Ultrastructural morphometry of bovine blastocysts produced in vivo or in vitro.

A E Crosier1, P W Farin, M J Dykstra, J E Alexander, C E Farin.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the ultrastructure of bovine blastocysts produced in vivo or in vitro by using morphometric analysis. Blastocysts produced in vivo (multiple ovulations, MO) were obtained from superovulated Holstein cows. For blastocysts produced in vitro, cumulus-oocyte complexes aspirated from ovaries of Holstein cows were matured and fertilized in vitro. At 20 h postinsemination (hpi), zygotes were distributed into one of three culture media: 1) IVPS (in vitro produced with serum): TCM-199 + 10% estrous cow serum (ECS); 2) IVPSR (in vitro produced with serum restriction): TCM-199 + 1% BSA until 72 hpi, followed by TCM-199 + 10% ECS from 72 to 168 hpi; and 3) mSOF (modified synthetic oviductal fluid): mSOF + 0.6% BSA. At 168 hpi, six or seven grade 1 blastocysts from each of the four treatments (MO, IVPS, IVPSR, and mSOF) were fixed and prepared for transmission electron microscopy. Random micrographs of each blastocyst were used to determine the volume density of cellular components. Overall, as blastocysts progressed in development, the volume densities of cytoplasm and intercellular space decreased (P < 0.05) and the volume densities of mature mitochondria, nuclei, blastocoele, and apoptotic bodies increased (P < 0.05). Across treatments, the proportional volumes of nuclei and inclusion bodies were increased in inner cell mass cells compared with trophectoderm cells for mid- and expanded blastocysts. For blastocysts produced in vitro, the volume density of mitochondria was decreased (P < 0.05) as compared with that of blastocycts produced in vivo. The proportional volume of vacuoles was increased (P < 0.05) in blastocysts from the mSOF treatment as compared with blastocysts produced in vivo. For mid- and expanded blastocysts from all three in vitro treatments, the volume density of lipid increased (P < 0.05) and the volume density of nuclei decreased (P < 0.05) compared with those of blastocysts produced in vivo. In conclusion, blastocysts produced in vitro possessed deviations in volume densities of organelles associated with cellular metabolism as well as deviations associated with altered embryonic differentiation. However, the specific nature of these deviations varied with the type of culture conditions used for in vitro embryo production.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11319141     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod64.5.1375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  15 in total

1.  Does serum cause lipid-droplet accumulation in bovine embryos produced in vitro, during developmental days 1 to 4?

Authors:  Melisa Candela Crocco; Diana Mabel Kelmansky; Marta Inés Mariano
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Examining and analyzing subcellular morphology of renal tissue treated by histotripsy.

Authors:  Frank Winterroth; Zhen Xu; Tzu-Yin Wang; J Erby Wilkinson; J Brian Fowlkes; William W Roberts; Charles A Cain
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Developmental potency of pre-implant parthenogenetic goat embryos: effect of activation protocols and culture media.

Authors:  Dharmendra Kumar; R Gopalakrishna; Ajay P Singh; Rakesh Ranjan; Saurabh K Pandey; Bikash C Sarkhel
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 2.416

4.  Colony-stimulating factor 2 (CSF-2) improves development and posttransfer survival of bovine embryos produced in vitro.

Authors:  Bárbara Loureiro; Luciano Bonilla; Jeremy Block; Justin M Fear; Aline Q S Bonilla; Peter J Hansen
Journal:  Endocrinology       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 4.736

5.  Transcriptome of D14 in vivo x in vitro bovine embryos: is there any difference?

Authors:  Ligiane Oliveira Leme; Grazieli Marinheiro Machado; Andrei Antonioni Guedes Fidelis; Ana Luiza Silva Guimarães; José Felipe Warmiling Sprícigo; José Oliveira Carvalho; I Pivato; Maurício Machaim Franco; Margot Alves Nunes Dode
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 2.416

Review 6.  A New Toolbox in Experimental Embryology-Alternative Model Organisms for Studying Preimplantation Development.

Authors:  Claudia Springer; Eckhard Wolf; Kilian Simmet
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2021-04-02

7.  RNA-Seq analysis uncovers transcriptomic variations between morphologically similar in vivo- and in vitro-derived bovine blastocysts.

Authors:  Ashley M Driver; Francisco Peñagaricano; Wen Huang; Khawaja R Ahmad; Katie S Hackbart; Milo C Wiltbank; Hasan Khatib
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Lipid profile of bovine grade-1 blastocysts produced either in vivo or in vitro before and after slow freezing process.

Authors:  Sarah Janati Idrissi; Daniel Le Bourhis; Antoine Lefevre; Patrick Emond; Laurene Le Berre; Olivier Desnoës; Thierry Joly; Samuel Buff; Virginie Maillard; Laurent Schibler; Pascal Salvetti; Sebastien Elis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Tumor necrosis factor alpha inhibits in vitro bovine embryo development through a prostaglandin mediated mechanism.

Authors:  Lauren R Jackson; Char E Farin; Scott Whisnant
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2012-03-01

10.  Development of a porcine (Sus scofa) embryo-specific microarray: array annotation and validation.

Authors:  Stephen Tsoi; Chi Zhou; Jason R Grant; J Alexander Pasternak; John Dobrinsky; Philippe Rigault; Julie Nieminen; Marc-André Sirard; Claude Robert; George R Foxcroft; Michael K Dyck
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.