PURPOSE: To assess whether case-based questions elicit different thinking processes from factual knowledge-based questions. METHOD: 20 general practitioners (GPs) and 20 students solved case-based questions and matched factual knowledge-based questions while thinking aloud. Verbatim protocols were analysed. Five indicators were defined: extent of protocols; immediate responses; re-reading of information given in the stem or case after the question had been read; order of re-reading information, and type of consideration, i.e. 'true-false' type or 'vector', that is, a deliberation which has a magnitude and a direction. RESULTS: Cases elicited longer protocols than factual knowledge questions. Students re-read more given information than GPs. GPs gave an immediate response on twice as many occasions as students. GPs re-ordered the case information, whereas students re-read the information in the order it was presented. This ordering difference was not found in the factual knowledge questions. Factual knowledge questions mainly led to 'true-false' considerations, whereas cases elicited mainly 'vector' considerations. CONCLUSION: Short case-based questions lead to thinking processes which represent problem-solving ability better than those elicited by factual knowledge questions.
PURPOSE: To assess whether case-based questions elicit different thinking processes from factual knowledge-based questions. METHOD: 20 general practitioners (GPs) and 20 students solved case-based questions and matched factual knowledge-based questions while thinking aloud. Verbatim protocols were analysed. Five indicators were defined: extent of protocols; immediate responses; re-reading of information given in the stem or case after the question had been read; order of re-reading information, and type of consideration, i.e. 'true-false' type or 'vector', that is, a deliberation which has a magnitude and a direction. RESULTS: Cases elicited longer protocols than factual knowledge questions. Students re-read more given information than GPs. GPs gave an immediate response on twice as many occasions as students. GPs re-ordered the case information, whereas students re-read the information in the order it was presented. This ordering difference was not found in the factual knowledge questions. Factual knowledge questions mainly led to 'true-false' considerations, whereas cases elicited mainly 'vector' considerations. CONCLUSION: Short case-based questions lead to thinking processes which represent problem-solving ability better than those elicited by factual knowledge questions.
Authors: Abigail C Halperin; L Anne Thompson; Jennifer C Hymer; Amber K Peterson; Beti Thompson Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2006 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: Thomas Rotthoff; Thomas Baehring; Hans-Dieter Dicken; Urte Fahron; Bernd Richter; Martin R Fischer; Werner A Scherbaum Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2006-10-10 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Esther M Bergman; Anique B H de Bruin; Marc A T M Vorstenbosch; Jan G M Kooloos; Ghita C W M Puts; Jimmie Leppink; Albert J J A Scherpbier; Cees P M van der Vleuten Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2015-08-15 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Steven J Durning; Michelle E Costanzo; Anthony R Artino; John Graner; Cees van der Vleuten; Thomas J Beckman; Christopher M Wittich; Michael J Roy; Eric S Holmboe; Lambert Schuwirth Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 2.708