K Rost1, P Nutting, J Smith, J Werner, N Duan. 1. Center for Studies in Family Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colo 80220, USA. Katryn.Rost@uchsc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether redefining primary care team roles would improve outcomes for patients beginning a new treatment episode for major depression. DESIGN: Following stratification, 6 of 12 practices were randomly assigned to the intervention condition. Intervention effectiveness was evaluated by patient reports of 6-month change in 100-point depression symptom and functional status scales. SETTING:Twelve community primary care practices across the country employing no onsite mental health professional. PATIENTS: Using two-stage screening, practices enrolled 479 depressed adult patients (73.4% of those eligible); 90.2% completed six-month follow-up. INTERVENTION: Two primary care physicians, one nurse, and one administrative staff member in each intervention practice receivedbrief training to improve the detection and management of major depression. MAIN RESULTS: In patients beginning a new treatment episode, the intervention improved depression symptoms by 8.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 16.1; P =.04). Within this group, the intervention improved depression symptoms by 16.2 points (95% CI, 4.5 to 27.9; P =.007), physical role functioning by 14.1 points (95% CI, 1.1 to 29.2; P =.07), and satisfaction with care (P =.02) for patients who reported antidepressant medication was an acceptable treatment at baseline. Patients already in treatment at enrollment did not benefit from the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In practices without onsite mental health professionals, brief interventions training primary care teams to assume redefined roles can significantly improve depression outcomes in patients beginning a new treatment episode. Such interventions should target patients who report that antidepressant medication is an acceptable treatment for their condition. More research is needed to determine how primary care teams can best sustain these redefined roles over time.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether redefining primary care team roles would improve outcomes for patients beginning a new treatment episode for major depression. DESIGN: Following stratification, 6 of 12 practices were randomly assigned to the intervention condition. Intervention effectiveness was evaluated by patient reports of 6-month change in 100-point depression symptom and functional status scales. SETTING: Twelve community primary care practices across the country employing no onsite mental health professional. PATIENTS: Using two-stage screening, practices enrolled 479 depressed adult patients (73.4% of those eligible); 90.2% completed six-month follow-up. INTERVENTION: Two primary care physicians, one nurse, and one administrative staff member in each intervention practice received brief training to improve the detection and management of major depression. MAIN RESULTS: In patients beginning a new treatment episode, the intervention improved depression symptoms by 8.2 points (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.2 to 16.1; P =.04). Within this group, the intervention improved depression symptoms by 16.2 points (95% CI, 4.5 to 27.9; P =.007), physical role functioning by 14.1 points (95% CI, 1.1 to 29.2; P =.07), and satisfaction with care (P =.02) for patients who reported antidepressant medication was an acceptable treatment at baseline. Patients already in treatment at enrollment did not benefit from the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: In practices without onsite mental health professionals, brief interventions training primary care teams to assume redefined roles can significantly improve depression outcomes in patients beginning a new treatment episode. Such interventions should target patients who report that antidepressant medication is an acceptable treatment for their condition. More research is needed to determine how primary care teams can best sustain these redefined roles over time.
Authors: D J Katzelnick; G E Simon; S D Pearson; W G Manning; C P Helstad; H J Henk; S M Cole; E H Lin; L H Taylor; K A Kobak Journal: Arch Fam Med Date: 2000-04
Authors: E M Hunkeler; J F Meresman; W A Hargreaves; B Fireman; W H Berman; A J Kirsch; J Groebe; S W Hurt; P Braden; M Getzell; P A Feigenbaum; T Peng; M Salzer Journal: Arch Fam Med Date: 2000-08
Authors: Harriet L MacMillan; Christopher J S Patterson; C Nadine Wathen; John W Feightner; Paul Bessette; R Wayne Elford; Denice S Feig; Joanne Langley; Valerie A Palda; Christopher Patterson; Bruce A Reeder; Ruth Walton Journal: CMAJ Date: 2005-01-04 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Peter P Roy-Byrne; Michelle G Craske; Murray B Stein; Greer Sullivan; Alexander Bystritsky; Wayne Katon; Daniela Golinelli; Cathy D Sherbourne Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 2005-03