Literature DB >> 11318837

Relationship between the severity of retinopathy and progression to photocoagulation in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in the UKPDS (UKPDS 52).

E M Kohner 1, I M Stratton, S J Aldington, R R Holman, D R Matthews.   

Abstract

AIM: to establish the degree to which the severity of retinopathy determines the risk for the need for subsequent photocoagulation in those with newly diagnosed Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
METHODS: Of 5102 patients entered into the UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS), 3709 had good quality retinal photographs that could be graded at entry. They were followed until the end of the study or until lost to follow-up, or until they received photocoagulation. Retinopathy severity was categorized as no retinopathy, microaneurysms (MA) only in one eye, MA in both eyes or more severe retinopathy features. The risk of photocoagulation was assessed in relation to severity of retinopathy at baseline, 3 and 6 years.
RESULTS: Of the 3709 patients assessed at entry to the UKPDS, 2316 had no retinopathy. Of these 0.2% needed photocoagulation at 3 years, 1.1% at 6 years and 2.6% at 9 years. Those with MA in one eye only (n = 708) were similar, with 0%, 1.9% and 4.7% needing photocoagulation by 3, 6 and 9 years, respectively. Amongst those who had more retinopathy features at entry (n = 509), 15.3% required photocoagulation by 3 years, and 31.9% by 9 years. When those without retinopathy at 6 years (n = 1579) were examined 3 and 6 years later (9 and 12 years after diagnosis), 0.1% and 1.8% required photocoagulation. Those with more severe retinopathy (n = 775) needed earlier treatment, 6.6% after 3 years and 13.3% after 9 years. The commonest indication for laser therapy was maculopathy, but those with more severe retinopathy were more likely to be treated for proliferative retinopathy and to need both eyes treated.
CONCLUSION: Few type 2 diabetic patients without retinopathy progress to photocoagulation in the following 3-6 years, while patients with more severe retinopathy lesions need to be monitored closely.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11318837     DOI: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2001.00458.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  31 in total

Review 1.  Screening for diabetic retinopathy and diabetic macular edema in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Tunde Peto; Christine Tadros
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Causes of preventable visual loss in type 2 diabetes mellitus: an evaluation of suboptimally timed retinal photocoagulation.

Authors:  Rodney A Hayward; Claude Cowan; Veda Giri; Mary G Lawrence; Fatima Makki
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 3.  The cost-effectiveness of three screening alternatives for people with diabetes with no or early diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  David B Rein; John S Wittenborn; Xinzhi Zhang; Benjamin A Allaire; Michael S Song; Ronald Klein; Jinan B Saaddine
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Diabetic retinopathy and insulin glargine.

Authors:  E Chantelau
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 5.  [Diagnosis, treatment and monitoring of diabetic eye control].

Authors:  Stephan Radda; Matthias Bolz; Stefan Egger; Vanessa Gasser-Steiner; Martina Kralinger; Stefan Mennel; Christoph Scholda; Ulrike Stolba; Andreas Wedrich; Katharina Krepler
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.704

6.  Validation of a model to estimate personalised screening frequency to monitor diabetic retinopathy.

Authors:  Amber A W A van der Heijden; Iris Walraven; Esther van 't Riet; Thor Aspelund; Sigrún H Lund; Petra Elders; Bettine C P Polak; Annette C Moll; Jan E E Keunen; Jacqueline M Dekker; Giel Nijpels
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 7.  The prevalence of retinopathy among type 2 diabetic patients in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Masoud Mohammadi; Ali Akbar Vaisi Raiegani; Rostam Jalali; Akram Ghobadi; Nader Salari
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 6.514

8.  The North Jutland County Diabetic Retinopathy Study: population characteristics.

Authors:  L L Knudsen; H-H Lervang; S Lundbye-Christensen; A Gorst-Rasmussen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-07-06       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  The accuracy of digital-video retinal imaging to screen for diabetic retinopathy: an analysis of two digital-video retinal imaging systems using standard stereoscopic seven-field photography and dilated clinical examination as reference standards.

Authors:  Mary Gilbert Lawrence
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2004

10.  [Diagnosis, therapy and follow up of diabetic eye disease].

Authors:  Michael Stur; Stefan Egger; Anton Haas; Gerhard Kieselbach; Stefan Mennel; Reinhard Michl; Michael Roden; Ulrike Stolba; Andreas Wedrich
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 1.704

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.