D J Diekema1, M L Beach, M A Pfaller, R N Jones. 1. Division of Medical Microbiology, Department of Pathology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. daniel-diekema@uiowa.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate antimicrobial resistance in viridans group streptococci (VGS) among patients with and without the diagnosis of cancer in the USA, Canada and Latin America. METHODS: All bloodstream isolates of VGS collected from SENTRY centers in the Western Hemisphere between January 1997 and December 1999 were tested by reference broth microdilution methods (NCCLS). Results for isolates from patients with cancer were compared to those from other patient populations. RESULTS: Overall, 438 unique patient bloodstream isolates of VGS were collected during the study. Percentage susceptible/MIC90 (mg/L) values for antimicrobials tested were as follows: penicillin, 66/1; erythromycin, 60/4; clindamycin, 92/0.12; cefepime, 86/1; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 80/2; ciprofloxacin, 44/> 2; gatifloxacin, 98/0.5; and vancomycin, 100/1. Of these isolates, 70 (16%) were confirmed to be from cancer patients. VGS isolates from cancer patients were less susceptible to most antimicrobials tested than were isolates from non-cancer patients. The greatest differences in susceptibility rates for cancer- versus non-cancer-associated VGS isolates were seen for ciprofloxacin (34% versus 46%, P = 0.07) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (64% versus 83%, P < 0.001), two agents which are often used for prophylaxis or as presumptive therapy in cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Susceptibility rates for VGS isolates from cancer patients are lower than those for isolates from patients without a cancer diagnosis. These differences are greatest for agents that have seen widespread prophylactic and empirical use. Ongoing surveillance of VGS infections in this patient population is important and should help to guide therapy decisions.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate antimicrobial resistance in viridans group streptococci (VGS) among patients with and without the diagnosis of cancer in the USA, Canada and Latin America. METHODS: All bloodstream isolates of VGS collected from SENTRY centers in the Western Hemisphere between January 1997 and December 1999 were tested by reference broth microdilution methods (NCCLS). Results for isolates from patients with cancer were compared to those from other patient populations. RESULTS: Overall, 438 unique patient bloodstream isolates of VGS were collected during the study. Percentage susceptible/MIC90 (mg/L) values for antimicrobials tested were as follows: penicillin, 66/1; erythromycin, 60/4; clindamycin, 92/0.12; cefepime, 86/1; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 80/2; ciprofloxacin, 44/> 2; gatifloxacin, 98/0.5; and vancomycin, 100/1. Of these isolates, 70 (16%) were confirmed to be from cancerpatients. VGS isolates from cancerpatients were less susceptible to most antimicrobials tested than were isolates from non-cancerpatients. The greatest differences in susceptibility rates for cancer- versus non-cancer-associated VGS isolates were seen for ciprofloxacin (34% versus 46%, P = 0.07) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (64% versus 83%, P < 0.001), two agents which are often used for prophylaxis or as presumptive therapy in cancerpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Susceptibility rates for VGS isolates from cancerpatients are lower than those for isolates from patients without a cancer diagnosis. These differences are greatest for agents that have seen widespread prophylactic and empirical use. Ongoing surveillance of VGS infections in this patient population is important and should help to guide therapy decisions.
Authors: Andrea S Gershon; Joyce C S de Azavedo; Allison McGeer; Krystyna I Ostrowska; Deirdre Church; Daryl J Hoban; Godfrey K M Harding; Karl Weiss; Lewis Abbott; Fiona Smaill; Marie Gourdeau; Gilles Murray; Donald E Low Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Rajesh M Prabhu; Kerryl E Piper; Larry M Baddour; James M Steckelberg; Walter R Wilson; Robin Patel Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2004-11 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Sandra S Richter; Wanita J Howard; Melvin P Weinstein; David A Bruckner; Janet F Hindler; Michael Saubolle; Gary V Doern Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2007-07-25 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Brad Spellberg; Henry F Chambers; Daniel M Musher; Thomas L Walsh; Arnold S Bayer Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-05-01 Impact factor: 21.873