Literature DB >> 11318560

Sylvatic and domestic Trichinella spp. in wild boars; infectivity, muscle larvae distribution, and antibody response.

C M Kapel1.   

Abstract

Thirty-six wild boars were inoculated with Trichinella spiralis, Trichinella nativa, Trichinella britovi, Trichinella pseudospiralis (USSR), T. pseudospiralis (USA), T. pseudospiralis (AUST), Trichinella murrelli, Trichinella T6, and Trichinella nelsoni. The wild boars were killed at 5 and 10 wk postinoculation (PI), and the number of muscle larvae per g (lpg) of tissue was determined for 18 muscles or muscle groups. Five weeks PI, all Trichinella genotypes had established as muscle larvae, but their infectivity varied widely: T. spiralis established in high numbers (mean = 296 lpg), T. britovi, T. nelsoni, and 1 of the T. pseudospiralis genotypes (AUST) in moderate numbers (mean = 53-74 lpg), whereas the remaining genotypes were poorly infective (mean 2-16 lpg). Because of considerable weight gain of the wild boars, an estimated total larval burden (live weight x lpg) was calculated for each animal. The total larval burden did not change significantly over time for T. spiralis, T. murrelli, T. britovi, T. nelsoni, and T. pseudospiralis (USA and USSR), whereas a significant reduction could be demonstrated for T. nativa, Trichinella T6, and T. pseudospiralis (AUST). Diaphragm and tongue were predilection sites in wild boars, independent of Trichinella genotype and infection level. At low infection levels, a greater percentage of larvae were found in diaphragm and tongue at 10 wk than 5 wk PI. Antibody responses increased rapidly between weeks 3 and 5 PI. For T. spiralis and T. nelsoni, the high antibody level persisted throughout the experimental period, but for T. nativa, T. britovi, T. murrelli, or Trichinella T6, the levels declined. For T. pseudospiralis, the antibody response increased more gradually between weeks 3 to 10 PI. Infection with all genotypes of Trichinella were detected using any of 7 excretory-secretory antigens, which points to the potential use of 1 common antigen for epidemiological studies on Trichinella in wild boars. In conclusion, T. spiralis is highly infective to wild boars, T. britovi, T. nelsoni, T. pseudospiralis (USA), and T. pseudospiralis (USSR) are moderately infective, and T. nativa, T. murrelli, T. pseudospiralis (AUST), and Trichinella T6 are poorly adapted to this host species.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11318560     DOI: 10.1645/0022-3395(2001)087[0309:SADTSI]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Parasitol        ISSN: 0022-3395            Impact factor:   1.276


  12 in total

1.  Epidemiology of Trichinella in the Arctic and subarctic: A review.

Authors:  Antti Oksanen; Age Kärssin; Rebecca P K D Berg; Anders Koch; Pikka Jokelainen; Rajnish Sharma; Emily Jenkins; Olga Loginova
Journal:  Food Waterborne Parasitol       Date:  2022-06-18

Review 2.  Trichinosis: epidemiology in Thailand.

Authors:  Natthawut Kaewpitoon; Soraya-Jatesadapattaya Kaewpitoon; Chutikan Philasri; Ratana Leksomboon; Chanvit Maneenin; Samaporn Sirilaph; Prasit Pengsaa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  High tolerance to repeated cycles of freezing and thawing in different Trichinella nativa isolates.

Authors:  Rebecca K Davidson; Kjell Handeland; Christian M O Kapel
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2008-07-02       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 4.  Epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, and control of trichinellosis.

Authors:  Bruno Gottstein; Edoardo Pozio; Karsten Nöckler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  Wild boars as sources for infectious diseases in livestock and humans.

Authors:  X J Meng; D S Lindsay; N Sriranganathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Disease risks associated with free-ranging wild boar in Saskatchewan.

Authors:  Glenna F McGregor; Marcelo Gottschalk; Dale L Godson; Wendy Wilkins; Trent K Bollinger
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.008

7.  Seroprevalence of Trichinella sp. in Wild Boars (Sus scrofa) from Yanggu-gun, Gangwon-do, Korea.

Authors:  Hye-Jung Lee; Ok-Sik Chung; Jae-Lip Kim; Seung-Ha Lee; Young-Bok Yoo; Min Seo
Journal:  Korean J Parasitol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 1.341

8.  A 38-year study on Trichinella spp. in wild boar (Sus scrofa) of Latvia shows a stable incidence with an increased parasite biomass in the last decade.

Authors:  Muza Kirjušina; Gunita Deksne; Gianluca Marucci; Eduards Bakasejevs; Inese Jahundoviča; Anžela Daukšte; Aleksandra Zdankovska; Zanda Bērziņa; Zanda Esīte; Antonino Bella; Fabio Galati; Angelika Krūmiņa; Edoardo Pozio
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2015-03-01       Impact factor: 3.876

Review 9.  Serological tools for detection of Trichinella infection in animals and humans.

Authors:  Yong Yang; Ya Nan Cai; Ming Wei Tong; Na Sun; Yin Hua Xuan; Yan Jun Kang; Isabelle Vallée; Pascal Boireau; Shi Peng Cheng; Ming Yuan Liu
Journal:  One Health       Date:  2016-03-04

10.  First case of Trichinella nativa infection in wild boar in Central Europe-molecular characterization of the parasite.

Authors:  Ewa Bilska-Zając; Mirosław Różycki; Ewa Chmurzyńska; Ewelina Antolak; Marek Próchniak; Katarzyna Grądziel-Krukowska; Jacek Karamon; Jacek Sroka; Jolanta Zdybel; Tomasz Cencek
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 2.289

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.