Literature DB >> 11318477

Speech processing strategy preferences among 55 European CLARION cochlear implant users.

L E Stollwerck1, K Goodrum-Clarke, C Lynch, G Armstrong-Bednall, T Nunn, L Markoff, L Mens, C McAnallen, J Wei, P Boyle, C George, Y Zilberman.   

Abstract

This multicentre study investigates the preference and performance of a group of 55 adult CLARION cochlear implant users with the choice of simultaneous analogue stimulation (SAS) and continuous interleaved sampler (CIS) strategies during the first 3 months of implant use. Subjects were programmed with both strategies and instructed to use each of the two strategies in daily life to ascertain preference. Subjects were tested in both strategies with open-set sentence materials, auditory alone, at 2, 6 and 12 weeks after the initial programming session. Questionnaires were completed with preference ratings being recorded for the two strategies: 25% of subjects preferred SAS and 75% CIS. Subjects performed better in their strategy of choice. Preferences were set very early on in the process and did not change. Factors influencing preference are discussed. Offering the choice of fundamentally different strategies improves both individual and group performance.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11318477     DOI: 10.1080/010503901300007001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand Audiol Suppl        ISSN: 0107-8593


  2 in total

1.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

2.  Perceptual Differences Between Low-Frequency Analog and Pulsatile Stimulation as Shown by Single- and Multidimensional Scaling.

Authors:  Natalia Stupak; Monica Padilla; Robert P Morse; David M Landsberger
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.