Literature DB >> 11318178

Flexible parametric measurement error models.

R J Carroll1, K Roeder, L Wasserman.   

Abstract

Inferences in measurement error models can be sensitive to modeling assumptions. Specifically, if the model is incorrect, the estimates can be inconsistent. To reduce sensitivity to modeling assumptions and yet still retain the efficiency of parametric inference, we propose using flexible parametric models that can accommodate departures from standard parametric models. We use mixtures of normals for this purpose. We study two cases in detail: a linear errors-in-variables model and a change-point Berkson model.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 11318178     DOI: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.1999.00044.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Estimation and testing based on data subject to measurement errors: from parametric to non-parametric likelihood methods.

Authors:  Albert Vexler; Wan-Min Tsai; Yaakov Malinovsky
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-29       Impact factor: 2.373

2.  Bayesian Semiparametric Density Deconvolution in the Presence of Conditionally Heteroscedastic Measurement Errors.

Authors:  Abhra Sarkar; Bani K Mallick; John Staudenmayer; Debdeep Pati; Raymond J Carroll
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.302

3.  A nonlinear measurement error model and its application to describing the dependency of health outcomes on dietary intake.

Authors:  B Curley
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 1.416

4.  Weak correlations in health services research: Weak relationships or common error?

Authors:  Alistair James O'Malley; Bruce E Landon; Lawrence A Zaborski; Eric T Roberts; Hazar H Khidir; Peter B Smulowitz; John Michael McWilliams
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-11-03       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Bayesian adjustment for measurement error in continuous exposures in an individually matched case-control study.

Authors:  Gabriela Espino-Hernandez; Paul Gustafson; Igor Burstyn
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-05-14       Impact factor: 4.615

6.  Uncertainty in the Bayesian meta-analysis of normally distributed surrogate endpoints.

Authors:  Sylwia Bujkiewicz; John R Thompson; Enti Spata; Keith R Abrams
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 3.021

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.