| Literature DB >> 11317683 |
L C Olivier1, S Assenmacher, D Kendoff, G Schmidt, H Towfigh, K P Schmit-Neuerburg.
Abstract
We compared the motion-stable wire suture by Towfigh (MSWST) with a modified Kessler suture (MKS) by following up flexor tendon repairs (MSWST, n = 21/39 digits; MKS, n = 20/31 digits). For MSWST we found 31 (79.5%) "excellent", 3 (7.7%) "good", and 5 (12.8%) "fair" results, when using the scoring system of Buck-Gramcko. In 3 (14.3%) patients the MSWST had to be removed owing to local irritation. In a further 3 (14.3%) patients, this was done when secondary tenolysis was necessary. The latter was also performed in 4 (20.0%) patients in whom the MKS was used. Here we found 23 (74.2%) excellent, 7 (22.6%) good, and 1 (3.2%) fair result. The statistical evaluation of the data concerning the patients' age, sex, the involved zone, the side, and the functional outcome did not reveal a significant difference (P < 0.05) between both groups and the chosen type of repair. The results of MSWST and MKS are similar, but MSWST allows early motion therapy without a splint or rubber-band protection.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2001 PMID: 11317683 DOI: 10.1007/s004020000204
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ISSN: 0936-8051 Impact factor: 3.067