Literature DB >> 11317114

Active therapy for chronic low back pain: part 3. Factors influencing self-rated disability and its change following therapy.

A F Mannion1, A Junge, S Taimela, M Müntener, K Lorenzo, J Dvorak.   

Abstract

DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of the factors influencing self-rated disability associated with chronic low back pain and prospective study of the relationship between changes in each of these factors and in disability following active therapy.
OBJECTIVES: To examine the relative influences of pain, psychological factors, and physiological factors on self-rated disability. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In chronic LBP, the interrelationship between physical impairment, pain, and disability is particularly complicated, due to the influence of various psychological factors and the lack of unequivocal methods for assessing impairment. Investigations using new "belief" questionnaires and "sophisticated" performance tests, which have shown promise as discriminating measures of impairment, may assist in clarifying the situation. Previous studies have rarely investigated all these factors simultaneously.
METHODS: One hundred forty-eight patients with cLBP completed questionnaires and underwent tests of mobility, strength, muscle activation, and fatigability, and (in a subgroup) erector spinae size and fiber size/type distribution. All measures were repeated after 3 months active therapy. Relationships between each factor and self-rated disability (Roland and Morris questionnaire) at baseline, and between the changes in each factor and changes in disability following therapy, were examined.
RESULTS: Stepwise linear regression showed that the most significant predictors of disability at baseline were, in decreasing order of importance: pain; psychological distress; fear-avoidance beliefs; muscle activation levels; lumbar range of motion; gender. Only changes in pain, psychological distress, and fear-avoidance beliefs significantly accounted for the changes in disability following therapy.
CONCLUSION: A combination of pain, psychological and physiological factors was best able to predict baseline disability, although its decrease following therapy was determined only by reductions in pain and psychological variables. The active therapy program-in addition to improving physical function-appeared capable of modifying important psychological factors, possibly as a result of the positive experience of completing the prescribed exercises without undue harm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11317114     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200104150-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  49 in total

Review 1.  Is a positive clinical outcome after exercise therapy for chronic non-specific low back pain contingent upon a corresponding improvement in the targeted aspect(s) of performance? A systematic review.

Authors:  F Steiger; B Wirth; E D de Bruin; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  What is the rate of functional improvement during occupational rehabilitation in workers' compensation claimants?

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Calvin Haws; Riikka Niemeläinen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

3.  Spine stabilisation exercises in the treatment of chronic low back pain: a good clinical outcome is not associated with improved abdominal muscle function.

Authors:  A F Mannion; F Caporaso; N Pulkovski; H Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  How well do observed functional limitations explain the variance in Roland Morris scores in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain undergoing physiotherapy?

Authors:  F Caporaso; N Pulkovski; H Sprott; A F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  The Michel Benoist and Robert Mulholland yearly European Spine Journal Review. A survey of the "surgical and research" articles in the European Spine Journal, 2004.

Authors:  Robert C Mulholland
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-01-28       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Effect sizes of non-surgical treatments of non-specific low-back pain.

Authors:  A Keller; J Hayden; C Bombardier; M van Tulder
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Reliability and validity study on the Hungarian versions of the oswestry disability index and the Quebec back pain disability scale.

Authors:  Tamás Valasek; Peter Paul Varga; Zsolt Szövérfi; Michelle Kümin; Jeremy Fairbank; Aron Lazary
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Spinal segmental stabilisation exercises for chronic low back pain: programme adherence and its influence on clinical outcome.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Daniel Helbling; Natascha Pulkovski; Haiko Sprott
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  [From GRIP to multimodal pain therapy. A concept asserts itself].

Authors:  J Hildebrandt; M Pfingsten
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Preliminary study into the components of the fear-avoidance model of LBP: change after an initial chiropractic visit and influence on outcome.

Authors:  Jonathan R Field; Dave Newell; Peter W McCarthy
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.