Literature DB >> 11317097

Provider type and the receipt of general and diabetes-related preventive health services among patients with diabetes.

J E Lafata1, S Martin, R Morlock, G Divine, H Xi.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Using a measure of provider type that includes "shared care" to determine the contribution of provider type on receipt of general and diabetes-related preventive health services.
METHODS: Automated clinical and administrative data were used to identify adult patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes receiving care from a multispecialty, salaried group practice and enrolled in a large health maintenance organization between 3/97 and 2/98 (n = 10,991). Logistic regression models were fit using generalized estimating equation approaches to evaluate the contribution of provider type on service receipt. MEASURES: Preventive service receipt included receipt of glycated hemoglobin and lipid testing, retinal examinations, pneumococcal vaccines, Papanicolaou (Pap) smears, and mammograms. Multivariable analyses adjusted for age, sex, race, marital status, household income, diabetes-related comorbidities and complications, prescription drug use, laboratory testing results, and frequency of medical care contact.
RESULTS: Patients seeing an endocrinologist and primary care physician (PCP) were more likely than those seeing endocrinologists alone to receive glycated hemoglobin testing (OR, 1.42), lipid testing (OR, 1.72), mammograms (OR, 2.12), and Pap smears (OR, 2.36), and more likely than those seeing PCPs alone to receive glycated hemoglobin testing (OR, 1.79), lipid testing (OR, 1.54), retinal examinations (OR, 1.33), and mammograms (OR, 1.43). Compared with patients seeing PCPs only, patient's seeing endocrinologists only were more likely to receive retinal examinations (OR, 1.37) and less likely to receive Pap smears (OR, 0.46).
CONCLUSIONS: Care delivered by no one single provider type is associated with greater receipt of all recommended services. Instead, patients seeing both an endocrinologist and a PCP are most likely to receive recommended services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11317097     DOI: 10.1097/00005650-200105000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Care        ISSN: 0025-7079            Impact factor:   2.983


  15 in total

1.  The paradox of primary care.

Authors:  Kurt C Stange; Robert L Ferrer
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.166

Review 2.  Dropping the baton: specialty referrals in the United States.

Authors:  Ateev Mehrotra; Christopher B Forrest; Caroline Y Lin
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.911

3.  Primary Care Providers Report Challenges to Cirrhosis Management and Specialty Care Coordination.

Authors:  Lauren A Beste; Bonnie K Harp; Rebecca K Blais; Ginger A Evans; Susan L Zickmund
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  The effect of specialist care within the first year on subsequent outcomes in 24,232 adults with new-onset diabetes mellitus: population-based cohort study.

Authors:  F A McAlister; S R Majumdar; D T Eurich; J A Johnson
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2007-02

5.  The use of computerized birthday greeting reminders in the management of diabetes.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Ann M Baker; George W Divine; Bruce D McCarthy; Hugo Xi
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Preventive health services and lifestyle practices in cancer survivors: a population health investigation.

Authors:  Patricia A Findley; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  J Cancer Surviv       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 4.442

Review 7.  Disparities in lupus care and outcomes.

Authors:  Kristina L Demas; Karen H Costenbader
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.006

8.  The Method for Performance Measurement Matters: Diabetes Care Quality as Measured by Administrative Claims and Institutional Registry.

Authors:  Rozalina G McCoy; Sidna M Tulledge-Scheitel; James M Naessens; Amy E Glasgow; Robert J Stroebel; Sarah J Crane; Kari S Bunkers; Nilay D Shah
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 9.  Breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dominika Bhatia; Iliana C Lega; Wei Wu; Lorraine L Lipscombe
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Racial disparities in lipid control in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  Darcy Saffar; Keoki Williams; Jennifer Elston Lafata; George Divine; Manel Pladevall
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.229

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.