Literature DB >> 11316501

The application of ground force explains the energetic cost of running backward and forward.

S Wright1, P G Weyand.   

Abstract

We compared backward with forward running to test the idea that the application of ground force to support the weight of the body determines the energetic cost of running. We hypothesized that higher metabolic rates during backward versus forward running would be directly related to greater rates of ground force application and the volume of muscle activated to apply support forces to the ground. Four trained males ran backward and forward under steady-state conditions at eight treadmill speeds from 1.75 to 3.50 m x s(-1). Rates of oxygen uptake were measured to determine metabolic rates, and inverse periods of foot-ground contact (1/tc) were measured to estimate rates of ground force application. As expected, at all eight speeds, both metabolic rates and estimated rates of ground force application were greater for backward than for forward running. At the five slowest speeds, the differences in rates of ground force application were directly proportional to the differences in metabolic rates between modes (paired t-test, P<0.05), but at the three highest speeds, small but significant differences in proportionality were present in this relationship. At one of these three higher speeds (3.0 m x s(-1)), additional measurements to estimate muscle volumes were made using a non-invasive force plate/video technique. These measurements indicated that the volume of muscle active per unit of force applied to the ground was 10+/-3% greater when running backward than forward at this speed. The product of rates of ground force application and estimated muscle volumes predicted a difference in metabolic rate that was indistinguishable from the difference we measured (34+/-6% versus 35+/-6%; means +/- s.e.m., N=4). We conclude that metabolic rates during running are determined by rates of ground force application and the volume of muscle activated to apply support forces to the ground.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11316501     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.10.1805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  10 in total

1.  Changing relative crank angle increases the metabolic cost of leg cycling.

Authors:  Asher H Straw; Wouter Hoogkamer; Rodger Kram
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  A New Direction to Athletic Performance: Understanding the Acute and Longitudinal Responses to Backward Running.

Authors:  Aaron Uthoff; Jon Oliver; John Cronin; Craig Harrison; Paul Winwood
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Running backwards: soft landing-hard takeoff, a less efficient rebound.

Authors:  G A Cavagna; M A Legramandi; A La Torre
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Developing a Low-Cost Force Treadmill via Dynamic Modeling.

Authors:  Chih-Yuan Hong; Lan-Yuen Guo; Rong Song; Mark L Nagurka; Jia-Li Sung; Chen-Wen Yen
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2017-06-04       Impact factor: 2.682

5.  Backward Running: Acute Effects on Sprint Performance in Preadolescent Boys.

Authors:  Dimitrios Petrakis; Eleni Bassa; Anastasia Papavasileiou; Anthi Xenofondos; Dimitrios A Patikas
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2020-04-23

6.  Prescribing Target Running Intensities for High-School Athletes: Can Forward and Backward Running Performance Be Autoregulated?

Authors:  Aaron Uthoff; Jon Oliver; John Cronin; Paul Winwood; Craig Harrison
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-09

7.  A Comparison of PlayerLoadTM and Heart Rate during Backwards and Forwards Locomotion during Intermittent Exercise in Rugby League Players.

Authors:  Matthew R Barnes; Joshua H Guy; Nathan Elsworthy; Aaron T Scanlan
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2021-01-25

8.  Comparison of Physiological and Perceptional Responses to 5-m Forward, Forward-Backward, and Lateral Shuttle Running.

Authors:  Chong Gao; Xiaolu Wang; Guochao Zhang; Li Huang; Mengyuan Han; Bo Li; George P Nassis; Yongming Li
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-02-17       Impact factor: 4.566

Review 9.  Human athletic paleobiology; using sport as a model to investigate human evolutionary adaptation.

Authors:  Daniel P Longman; Jonathan C K Wells; Jay T Stock
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 2.868

10.  Biomechanical and metabolic aspects of backward (and forward) running on uphill gradients: another clue towards an almost inelastic rebound.

Authors:  L Rasica; S Porcelli; A E Minetti; G Pavei
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.078

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.