Literature DB >> 11315996

A three-dimensional simulation of age-related remodeling in trabecular bone.

J C Van Der Linden1, J A Verhaar, H Weinans.   

Abstract

After peak bone mass has been reached, the bone remodeling process results in a decrease in bone mass and strength. The formation deficit, the deficit of bone formation compared with previous resorption, results in bone loss. Moreover, trabeculae disconnected by resorption cavities probably are not repaired. The contributions of these mechanisms to the total bone loss are unclear. To investigate these contributions and the concomitant changes in trabecular architecture and mechanical properties, we made a computer simulation model of bone remodeling using microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) scans of human vertebral trabecular bone specimens. Up to 50 years of physiological remodeling were simulated. Resorption cavities were created and refilled 3 months later. These cavities were not refilled completely, to simulate the formation deficit. Disconnected trabeculae were not repaired; loose fragments generated during the simulation were removed. Resorption depth, formation deficit, and remodeling space were based on biological data. The rate of bone loss varied between 0.3% and 1.1% per year. Stiffness anisotropy increased, and morphological anisotropy (mean intercept length [MIL]) was almost unaffected. Connectivity density increased or decreased, depending on the remodeling parameters. The formation deficit accounted for 69-95%, disconnected trabeculae for 1-21%, and loose fragments for 1-17% of the bone loss. Increasing formation deficit from 1.8% to 5.4% tripled bone loss but only doubled the decrease in stiffness. Increasing resorption depth from 28 to 56 microm slightly increased bone loss but drastically decreased stiffness. Decreasing the formation deficit helps to prevent bone loss, but reducing resorption depth is more effective in preventing loss of mechanical stiffness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11315996     DOI: 10.1359/jbmr.2001.16.4.688

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  12 in total

1.  Testing two predictions for fracture load using computer models of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Michael A K Liebschner; Ralph Müller; Sunil J Wimalawansa; Chamith S Rajapakse; Gemunu H Gunaratne
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-05-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Effects of microarchitecture on bone strength.

Authors:  Jacqueline C van der Linden; Harrie Weinans
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.096

3.  Dynamic simulation of three dimensional architectural and mechanical alterations in human trabecular bone during menopause.

Authors:  X Sherry Liu; Angela H Huang; X Henry Zhang; Paul Sajda; Baohua Ji; X Edward Guo
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 4.  From histology to micro-CT: Measuring and modeling resorption cavities and their relation to bone competence.

Authors:  Jef Vanderoost; G Harry van Lenthe
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-28

5.  Three-dimensional dynamic bone histomorphometry.

Authors:  Craig R Slyfield; Evgeniy V Tkachenko; David L Wilson; Christopher J Hernandez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 6.  The use of bone mineral density measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and peripheral quantitative computed microtomography in chronic kidney disease.

Authors:  Martin Jannot; Fabrice Mac-Way; Vanessa Lapierre; Marie-Helene Lafage-Proust
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 3.902

7.  An adaptation model for trabecular bone at different mechanical levels.

Authors:  He Gong; Dong Zhu; Jiazi Gao; Linwei Lv; Xizheng Zhang
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.819

8.  Patient-specific bone modelling and remodelling simulation of hypoparathyroidism based on human iliac crest biopsies.

Authors:  Patrik Christen; Keita Ito; Ralph Müller; Mishaela R Rubin; David W Dempster; John P Bilezikian; Bert van Rietbergen
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-08-09       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  New suggestions for the mechanical control of bone remodeling.

Authors:  J W C Dunlop; M A Hartmann; Y J Bréchet; P Fratzl; R Weinkamer
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 10.  The effect of the microscopic and nanoscale structure on bone fragility.

Authors:  M E Ruppel; L M Miller; D B Burr
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.