BACKGROUND: Loosening of orthopaedic implants is mediated by cytokines that elicit bone resorption and are produced in response to phagocytosis of implant-derived wear particles. This accelerated bone resorption could be due to increased osteoclastic activity, survival, or differentiation. Although a number of in vitro studies have shown that wear particles increase osteoclastic activity, the increase was less than twofold in all cases. The objective of the current study was to test the hypothesis that wear particles stimulate bone resorption by inducing osteoclast differentiation. METHODS: Conditioned media were prepared from murine marrow cells or human peripheral blood monocytes incubated in the presence or absence of titanium particles. The effects of conditioned media on osteoclast differentiation were examined with use of a recently developed assay in which osteoclast precursors are co-cultured with mesenchymal support cells. RESULTS: The present study showed that titanium particles induced both murine marrow cells and human peripheral blood monocytes to produce factors that stimulated osteoclast differentiation. The mean increase in osteoclast differentiation was 29.3+/-9.4-fold. The stimulation of osteoclast differentiation led to a parallel increase in bone resorption. The amount of stimulation was regulated in a dose-dependent manner by the concentration of both titanium particles and conditioned media. The stimulation of osteoclast differentiation required interactions between the cells and the particles themselves and, therefore, was not due to metal ions, soluble contaminants released from the particles, or submicrometer particles. In contrast, conditioned media from control cells incubated in the absence of titanium particles had no detectable effect on any of the examined parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that titanium particles stimulate in vitro bone resorption primarily by inducing osteoclast differentiation. In contrast, the titanium particles had only small effects on osteoclast activity or survival.
BACKGROUND: Loosening of orthopaedic implants is mediated by cytokines that elicit bone resorption and are produced in response to phagocytosis of implant-derived wear particles. This accelerated bone resorption could be due to increased osteoclastic activity, survival, or differentiation. Although a number of in vitro studies have shown that wear particles increase osteoclastic activity, the increase was less than twofold in all cases. The objective of the current study was to test the hypothesis that wear particles stimulate bone resorption by inducing osteoclast differentiation. METHODS: Conditioned media were prepared from murine marrow cells or human peripheral blood monocytes incubated in the presence or absence of titanium particles. The effects of conditioned media on osteoclast differentiation were examined with use of a recently developed assay in which osteoclast precursors are co-cultured with mesenchymal support cells. RESULTS: The present study showed that titanium particles induced both murine marrow cells and human peripheral blood monocytes to produce factors that stimulated osteoclast differentiation. The mean increase in osteoclast differentiation was 29.3+/-9.4-fold. The stimulation of osteoclast differentiation led to a parallel increase in bone resorption. The amount of stimulation was regulated in a dose-dependent manner by the concentration of both titanium particles and conditioned media. The stimulation of osteoclast differentiation required interactions between the cells and the particles themselves and, therefore, was not due to metal ions, soluble contaminants released from the particles, or submicrometer particles. In contrast, conditioned media from control cells incubated in the absence of titanium particles had no detectable effect on any of the examined parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that titanium particles stimulate in vitro bone resorption primarily by inducing osteoclast differentiation. In contrast, the titanium particles had only small effects on osteoclast activity or survival.
Authors: Jui-Ting Hsu; Chih-Han Chang; Kai-Nan An; Mark E Zobitz; Rapin Phimolsarnti; Ronald R Hugate; Kuo-An Lai Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2006-09-01 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Maria Ovrenovits; Emilios E Pakos; Georgios Vartholomatos; Nikolaos K Paschos; Theodoros A Xenakis; Grigorios I Mitsionis Journal: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol Date: 2015-07-12
Authors: Daniel P Crane; Kirill Gromov; Dan Li; Kjeld Søballe; Christian Wahnes; Hubert Büchner; Matthew J Hilton; Regis J O'Keefe; Clinton K Murray; Edward M Schwarz Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Michelle A Beidelschies; Honglian Huang; Megan R McMullen; Matthew V Smith; Andrew S Islam; Victor M Goldberg; Xin Chen; Laura E Nagy; Edward M Greenfield Journal: J Cell Physiol Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 6.384
Authors: Ryosuke Tsutsumi; Chao Xie; Xiaochao Wei; Minjie Zhang; Xinping Zhang; Lisa M Flick; Edward M Schwarz; Regis J O'Keefe Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 6.741