Literature DB >> 11315246

Sociopolitical diversity in psychology. The case for pluralism.

R E Redding1.   

Abstract

Psychology celebrates diversity, recognizes the value and legitimacy of diverse beliefs, and strives to be inclusive. Yet, the profession lacks sociopolitical diversity. Most psychologists are politically liberal, and conservatives are vastly underrepresented in the profession. Moreover, when sociopolitical views guide the research, advocacy, or professional practice of psychologists, those views most often are liberal. The lack of political diversity in psychology has unintended negative consequences for research, policy advocacy, clinical practice, the design and implementation of social interventions, and professional education. It excludes or marginalizes conservatives and conservative views, having detrimental effects on the profession in each of these areas. This article examines the importance of political diversity and the negative consequences of its absence and provides strategies for increasing sociopolitical pluralism in psychology.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11315246     DOI: 10.1037//0003-066x.56.3.205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  3 in total

1.  Testing the Controversy : An Empirical Examination of Adaptationists' Attitudes Toward Politics and Science.

Authors:  Joshua M Tybur; Geoffrey F Miller; Steven W Gangestad
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2007-12

2.  A response to the Academy of Science of South Africa's Diversity in Human Sexuality Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2015-11

3.  Structuring the debate about research ethics in the psychology and law field: an international perspective.

Authors:  Alfred Allan
Journal:  Psychiatr Psychol Law       Date:  2020-04-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.