Literature DB >> 11314908

Performance of neonatal and infant hearing screens: sensitivity and specificity.

A Davis1, J Bamford, J Stevens.   

Abstract

The terms 'sensitivity' and 'specificity' are defined and some of the factors that determine their values are discussed in the context of screening for permanent childhood hearing loss. There is a need to distinguish between the values observed in 'simple experiments' and those that may be obtained under more realistic 'field' conditions. It is not feasible to give a meta-analytic overview of published data because of the variety of methods and objectives used in those studies published in the literature. However, a qualitative synthesis of the data is possible. This suggests that most proposed neonatal hearing screening tests, when implemented in accordance with a programme of quality assurance, can be reasonably accurate at a modest cost. However, the optimal combination of tests and test parameters for given populations has not yet been fully researched. The infant distraction test screen has a lower sensitivity than neonatal hearing screening tests, particularly for moderate impairments, accompanied by a fairly low specificity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11314908     DOI: 10.1080/03005364.2001.11742727

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Audiol        ISSN: 0300-5364


  4 in total

1.  [Duration of automated auditory brainstem response test for the initial hearing screening and influencing factors for the duration in neonates].

Authors:  Na Tian; Xiu-Li Ju; Bo Xu; Nan Zheng; Min Zhao
Journal:  Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-10

2.  Prevalence of permanent childhood hearing impairment in the United Kingdom and implications for universal neonatal hearing screening: questionnaire based ascertainment study.

Authors:  H M Fortnum; A Q Summerfield; D H Marshall; A C Davis; J M Bamford
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-09-08

3.  Effectiveness of Interventions on Improving Balance in Children and Adolescents With Hearing Impairment: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Yan Zhou; Jing Qi
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Cochlear implants in the United Kingdom: awareness and utilization.

Authors:  Chris Raine
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2013-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.