Literature DB >> 1131477

Temporal numerosity discrimination: intermodal comparisons revisited.

E C Lechelt.   

Abstract

Temporal numerosity discrimination was investigated for visual, auditory and tactile senses. Trains of two to nine signals (flashes, clicks, taps) were presented at rates of from 3 per sec. to 8 per se. The subjects were instructed specifically to report only the number of signals counted. Significant modality differences were obtained. Auditory counts were almost perfectly accurate inder all conditions. Visual judgement of number, which were consistently the least accurate, were underestimated. The error increased appreciably as the rate increased from 3 per sec. to 6 per sec. but decreased with rates of 7 per sec. and 8 per sec. Tactile reports also underestimated the actual number of signals, the underestimation increasing linearly as a function of rate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1131477     DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1975.tb01444.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychol        ISSN: 0007-1269


  6 in total

1.  A primarily serial, foveal accumulator underlies approximate numerical estimation.

Authors:  Samuel J Cheyette; Steven T Piantadosi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Audiotactile interactions in temporal perception.

Authors:  Valeria Occelli; Charles Spence; Massimiliano Zampini
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-06

3.  On cross-modal similarity: perceiving temporal patterns by hearing, touch, and vision.

Authors:  L E Marks
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1987-09

4.  Matching the rate of concurrent tone bursts and light flashes as a function of flash surround luminance.

Authors:  A K Myers; B Cotton; H A Hilp
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1981-07

5.  Repetition blindness: the effects of stimulus modality and spatial displacement.

Authors:  N Kanwisher; M C Potter
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-03

6.  Effect of frequency difference on sensitivity of beats perception.

Authors:  Soo-Chul Lim; Ki-Uk Kyung; Dong-Soo Kwon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.