Literature DB >> 11314606

Clinical ethics support services in the UK: an investigation of the current provision of ethics support to health professionals in the UK.

A Slowther1, C Bunch, B Woolnough, T Hope.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify and describe the current state of clinical ethics support services in the UK.
DESIGN: A series of questionnaire surveys of key individuals in National Health Service (NHS) trusts, health authorities, health boards, local research ethics committees and health professional organisations. Interviews with chairmen/women of clinical ethics committees identified in the surveys.
SETTING: The UK National Health Service.
RESULTS: Responses to the questionnaires were received from all but one NHS trust and all but one health authority/board. A variety of models of clinical ethics support were identified including twenty formal clinical ethics committees (CECs). A further twenty NHS trusts expressed an intention to establish a CEC within the next twelve months. Most CECs in the UK have been in existence less than five years and are still defining their role. The chairmen identified education of committee members and contact with other ethics committees as important requirements for committee development. Problems were identified around lack of support for the committee and with raising the profile of the committee within the institution. There has been little evaluation of clinical ethics support services either in the UK or in other countries with longer established services. What evaluation has occurred has focused on process rather than outcome measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical ethics support services are developing in the UK. A number of issues have been identified that need to be addressed if such support services are to develop effectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioethics and Professional Ethics; Empirical Approach; National Health Service

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11314606      PMCID: PMC1765530          DOI: 10.1136/jme.27.suppl_1.i2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  28 in total

1.  The Clinical Ethics Committee at Barts and the London NHS Trust: rationale, achievements, and difficulties.

Authors:  Len Doyal; Brian Colvin
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2002-03

2.  Resource allocation decisions in U.K. healthcare: do ethics committees have a role?

Authors:  Anne Slowther; Tony Hope
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2002-03

3.  Clinical ethics committees: opportunity or threat?

Authors:  Anne Slowther; Donald Hill; John McMillan
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2002-03

4.  Meeting the ethical needs of doctors.

Authors:  Daniel K Sokol
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-04-02

5.  Project examining effectiveness in clinical ethics (PEECE): phase 1-- descriptive analysis of nine clinical ethics services.

Authors:  M D Godkin; K Faith; R E G Upshur; S K Macrae; C S Tracy
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  HEC member perspectives on the case analysis process: a qualitative multi-site study.

Authors:  Eric Racine
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2007-09

7.  Health professionals: how much employee loyalty should we expect in a privatising system?

Authors:  Stephen Wilmot
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2008-11-05

8.  Implicit and explicit clinical ethics support in The Netherlands: a mixed methods overview study.

Authors:  Linda Dauwerse; Froukje Weidema; Tineke Abma; Bert Molewijk; Guy Widdershoven
Journal:  HEC Forum       Date:  2014-06

9.  What and who are clinical ethics committees for?

Authors:  Sheila A M McLean
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 10.  Evaluating the effectiveness of clinical ethics committees: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chiara Crico; Virginia Sanchini; Paolo Giovanni Casali; Gabriella Pravettoni
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2020-11-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.