Literature DB >> 11314134

Comparison of the morphology of the "cleft face" and the normal face: defining the anthropometric differences.

L G Farkas1, C R Forrest, J H Phillips.   

Abstract

Morphological characteristics of the "cleft face" were analyzed by calculating proportion indices in young adults who had undergone surgery in childhood for cleft lip and/or palate: 592 in 37 subjects with unilateral clefts and 432 in 27 with bilateral clefts. Three areas of the face with 16 indices based on 12 projective linear measurements were analyzed in each subject: 5 indices in the general face, 6 in the upper face, and 5 in the lower. Although a balanced relationship was found in two thirds of the indices assessed, severe disproportions, which greatly influence appearance, were noted in about one quarter. In the general face, the most frequent abnormal anthropometric findings contributing to severe disproportions were small upper-face height and a severely high or moderately narrow mandible. In the soft tissues, disproportions included wide nose, small nasal tip protrusion, and short or long columella. Deviations from normality were rarely noted in the nose and upper-lip height, mouth width, total facial height, and width of the upper face. In the upper face, severe disproportions occurred much more frequently in bilateral cleft subjects (67.6%) than in unilateral clefts (30.3%). In the lower face, however, severe disproportions were twice as frequent among unilateral clefts (39.4%) than bilateral (14.7%). The results, although interesting, require complementary preoperative data for reliable analysis of the adult "cleft face."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11314134     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200011020-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Long-Term Effect of Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis (DO) on Nasal Index in Adult Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate Deformities.

Authors:  Ashok Kumar Jena; Vidya Rattan; Satinder Pal Singh; Ashok Kumar Utreja; Singh Sombir
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-04-28

2.  [Functional and aesthetic outcome of nasal surgery in cleft lip palate patients].

Authors:  H Hümpfner-Hierl; T Hierl; A Hemprich
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2003-07-03

3.  Accuracy and precision of a 3D anthropometric facial analysis with and without landmark labeling before image acquisition.

Authors:  Noyan Aynechi; Brent E Larson; Vladimir Leon-Salazar; Soraya Beiraghi
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Evaluation of the use of auricular composite graft for secondary unilateral cleft lip nasal alar deformity repair.

Authors:  Percy Rossell-Perry; Carolina Romero-Narvaez
Journal:  Plast Surg Int       Date:  2014-09-25

Review 5.  Nostril Morphometry Evaluation before and after Cleft Lip Surgical Correction: Clinical Evidence.

Authors:  Mario Jorge Frassy Feijo; Stella Ramos Brandão; Rui Manoel Rodrigues Pereira; Mariana Batista de Souza Santos; Hilton Justino da Silva
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-01-06

6.  Three-dimensional facial analysis of Chinese children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Siti Adibah Othman; Noor Airin Aidil Koay
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.