Literature DB >> 11314124

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis: a method with skeletal anchorage.

G Swennen1, T Dujardin, A Goris, A De Mey, C Malevez.   

Abstract

Maxillary distraction osteogenesis is a challenging technique to treat severe maxillary retrusion. Maxillary advancement by distraction has the advantage to provide new bone in combination with simultaneous expansion of the soft-tissue functional matrix. Cleft lip and palate patients can present with severe maxillary retrusion and Class III malocclusion. Two 13-year-old patients, born with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate, underwent maxillary distraction--one had a bilateral, the other a unilateral complete cleft lip and palate. Maxillary advancement was performed using an external distraction device in combination with titanium miniplates as a skeletal maxillary anchorage. After a complete Lefort I osteotomy with pterygomaxillary disjunction, a latency period of 3 days was respected. On the fourth postoperative day, distraction was initiated at the rate of 1 mm/d. Preoperative clinical photographs, dental casts, lateral cephalograms, and panoramic radiographs were taken. Further lateral cephalograms were obtained after the latency period, after completion of the active period of distraction, at the completion of the consolidation period, and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The aesthetic outcome was excellent and skeletal advancement of 8 and 7 mm was measured without dentoalveolar compensations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11314124     DOI: 10.1097/00001665-200011020-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Wide alveolar cleft and midface distraction: Report of a case.

Authors:  Stuti Singh; Divya Mehrotra; Chandan Gupta
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2012-06-18

2.  A clinical evaluation of midface advancement using intraoral distractors in management of bone stock deficiencies.

Authors:  Ramen Sinha; P Suresh Menon; M G Venugopal
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-08-07

3.  Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Eline E B De Clerck; Gwen R J Swennen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Biomechanical comparison of two intraoperative mobilization techniques for maxillary distraction osteogenesis: Down-fracture versus non-down-fracture.

Authors:  Lili Yang; Eduardo Yugo Suzuki; Boonsiva Suzuki
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Dec

5.  Profile Changes and Stability following Distraction Osteogenesis with Rigid External Distraction in Adult Cleft Lip and Palate Deformities.

Authors:  Jaeson M Painatt; Ravi Veeraraghavan; Ushass Puthalath; Sherry Peter; Latha P Rao; Maria Kuriakose
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun

6.  Treatment outcome and long-term stability of skeletal changes following maxillary distraction in adult subjects of cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Satinder Pal Singh; Ashok Kumar Jena; Vidya Rattan; Ashok Kumar Utreja
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-04
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.