Literature DB >> 11314002

Loss of heterozygosity at 4p16.3 and mutation of FGFR3 in transitional cell carcinoma.

K Sibley1, D Cuthbert-Heavens, M A Knowles.   

Abstract

4p16.3 has previously been identified as a region of non-random LOH in transitional cell carcinoma, suggesting the presence of a tumour suppressor gene. One candidate within this region is fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3). Germline mutations in FGFR3 are known to cause several autosomal dominant skeletal dysplasias, the severity of which depends on the position and nature of the mutation in the protein. We investigated the frequency and nature of FGFR3 mutations in a panel of transitional cell carcinomas and cell lines and studied the possible link between mutation and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on 4p16.3. FGFR3 coding sequence from 63 transitional cell carcinomas (TCC) of various stages and grades, and 18 cell lines was analysed by fluorescent SSCP. Samples with abnormal migration patterns were sequenced to identify the mutation or polymorphism. Thirty-one of the 63 tumours had previously been assessed to have LOH at 4p16.3. Twenty-six of the 63 tumours (41%) and 4/18 (22%) of the cell lines had missense mutations in FGFR3. All mutations detected in our panel have been reported in the germline where all apart from one cause lethal conditions. One tumour contained K652Q which has recently been identified in less severe cases of skeletal dysplasia. Tumours with and without LOH at 4p16.3 had mutations in FGFR3 suggesting that these two events are not causally linked. The frequency of FGFR3 mutation indicates that this protein plays an important role in TCC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11314002     DOI: 10.1038/sj.onc.1204110

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncogene        ISSN: 0950-9232            Impact factor:   9.867


  28 in total

Review 1.  Muscle-invasive urothelial bladder cancer: an update on systemic therapy.

Authors:  Hayley Knollman; J Luke Godwin; Rishi Jain; Yu-Ning Wong; Elizabeth R Plimack; Daniel M Geynisman
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2015-12

Review 2.  Genomic Subtyping in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Tuomas Jalanko; Joep J de Jong; Ewan A Gibb; Roland Seiler; Peter C Black
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 3.  What we could do now: molecular pathology of bladder cancer.

Authors:  M A Knowles
Journal:  Mol Pathol       Date:  2001-08

Review 4.  Targeting mutant fibroblast growth factor receptors in cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Greulich; Pamela M Pollock
Journal:  Trends Mol Med       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.951

Review 5.  Molecular genetics of bladder cancer: Emerging mechanisms of tumor initiation and progression.

Authors:  David J McConkey; Sangkyou Lee; Woonyoung Choi; Mai Tran; Tadeusz Majewski; Sooyong Lee; Arlene Siefker-Radtke; Colin Dinney; Bogdan Czerniak
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 6.  Contemporary management of low-risk bladder cancer.

Authors:  Johannes Falke; J Alfred Witjes
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 7.  Molecular pathogenesis of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Margaret A Knowles
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-08-15       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 8.  Role of FGFR3 in urothelial cell carcinoma: biomarker and potential therapeutic target.

Authors:  Margaret A Knowles
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Mutant fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 induces intracellular signaling and cellular transformation in a cell type- and mutation-specific manner.

Authors:  E di Martino; C G L'Hôte; W Kennedy; D C Tomlinson; M A Knowles
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2009-09-14       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  Targeted therapies in the management of metastatic bladder cancer.

Authors:  Matteo Fassan; Edouard J Trabulsi; Leonard G Gomella; Raffaele Baffa
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2007-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.