Literature DB >> 11313730

Diagnostic yield of conventional and digital cephalometric images: a human cadaver study.

F Gijbels1, C Bou Serhal, G Willems, H Bosmans, G Sanderink, M Persoons, R Jacobs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the clinical efficacy of digital and conventional cephalometric imaging.
METHODS: Conventional and photostimulable phosphor cephalometric radiographs were obtained from three human cadavers at nine different exposure settings. Subjective image quality was assessed by six observers who evaluated six cephalometric landmarks. Organ doses were measured with TLDs and effective doses calculated.
RESULTS: Compared with conventional cephalometric images, digital images had a consistently better subjective image quality for all exposure settings which was significant (P<0.05) for all but two. Organ doses were comparable. Higher kV and lower mAs settings yielded the lowest effective dose, which was highly dependent on the position of the thyroid gland in the beam.
CONCLUSION: Relatively small variations in exposure settings do not influence subjective diagnostic image quality of digital cephalometric radiographs. Higher kV and lower mAs settings have the lowest effective dose and should therefore be preferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11313730     DOI: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600585

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  3 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of patient movement during simulated acquisition of cephalometric radiographs.

Authors:  Kyung-Hoe Huh; Erika Benavides; Young-Tak Jo; Bo-Ram Choi; Won-Jin Yi; Min-Suk Heo; Sam-Sun Lee; Soon-Chul Choi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  The Effect of Emboss Enhancement on Reliability of Landmark Identification in Digital Lateral Cephalometric Images.

Authors:  Sima Nikneshan; Sudeh Mohseni; Mahtab Nouri; Hoora Hadian; Mohammad Javad Kharazifard
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 0.212

Review 3.  Validity of 2D lateral cephalometry in orthodontics: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ana R Durão; Pisha Pittayapat; Maria Ivete B Rockenbach; Raphael Olszewski; Suk Ng; Afonso P Ferreira; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.750

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.