Literature DB >> 11313467

Protein binding protects sites on stable episomes and in the chromosome from de novo methylation.

L Han1, I G Lin, C L Hsieh.   

Abstract

We have utilized the Escherichia coli lac repressor-operator system to test whether protein binding can interfere with de novo DNA methylation in mammalian cells. We find that a DNA binding protein can protect sites on the episome as well as in the genome from the de novo methylation activity of Dnmt3a. Transcriptional machinery moving through the binding sites does not affect the de novo methylation of these sites, and it does not affect the binding protein protection of these sites from de novo methylation. This study and previous studies provide a possible mechanism for the observation that an Sp1 site can serve as a cis-acting signal for demethylation and for preventing de novo methylation of the CpG island upstream of the mouse adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (Aprt) gene. These findings also support the hypothesis that protein binding may play a crucial role in changes of CpG methylation pattern in mammalian cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11313467      PMCID: PMC100263          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.21.10.3416-3424.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  36 in total

1.  Chromatin differences between active and inactive X chromosomes revealed by genomic footprinting of permeabilized cells using DNase I and ligation-mediated PCR.

Authors:  G P Pfeifer; A D Riggs
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 11.361

2.  Dependence of transcriptional repression on CpG methylation density.

Authors:  C L Hsieh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  DNA methylation and chromatin structure: a view from below.

Authors:  E U Selker
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 13.807

4.  In vivo footprint and methylation analysis by PCR-aided genomic sequencing: comparison of active and inactive X chromosomal DNA at the CpG island and promoter of human PGK-1.

Authors:  G P Pfeifer; R L Tanguay; S D Steigerwald; A D Riggs
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 5.  Targeting chromatin disruption: Transcription regulators that acetylate histones.

Authors:  A P Wolffe; D Pruss
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1996-03-22       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Positioned nucleosomes inhibit Dam methylation in vivo.

Authors:  M P Kladde; R T Simpson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-02-15       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A whole genome approach to in vivo DNA-protein interactions in E. coli.

Authors:  M X Wang; G M Church
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Sp1 elements protect a CpG island from de novo methylation.

Authors:  M Brandeis; D Frank; I Keshet; Z Siegfried; M Mendelsohn; A Nemes; V Temper; A Razin; H Cedar
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-09-29       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Active genes in budding yeast display enhanced in vivo accessibility to foreign DNA methylases: a novel in vivo probe for chromatin structure of yeast.

Authors:  J Singh; A J Klar
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 11.361

10.  Sp1 sites in the mouse aprt gene promoter are required to prevent methylation of the CpG island.

Authors:  D Macleod; J Charlton; J Mullins; A P Bird
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  26 in total

1.  Methylation and epigenetic fidelity.

Authors:  Arthur D Riggs; Zhenggang Xiong
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The barrier function of an insulator couples high histone acetylation levels with specific protection of promoter DNA from methylation.

Authors:  Vesco J Mutskov; Catherine M Farrell; Paul A Wade; Alan P Wolffe; Gary Felsenfeld
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Fidelity of the methylation pattern and its variation in the genome.

Authors:  Toshikazu Ushijima; Naoko Watanabe; Eriko Okochi; Atsushi Kaneda; Takashi Sugimura; Kazuaki Miyamoto
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 4.  Allele-specific DNA methylation: beyond imprinting.

Authors:  Benjamin Tycko
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 6.150

5.  Transcriptional activity affects the H3K4me3 level and distribution in the coding region.

Authors:  Cindy Yen Okitsu; John Cheng Feng Hsieh; Chih-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-04-19       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 6.  Mammalian cytosine methylation at a glance.

Authors:  Steen K T Ooi; Anne H O'Donnell; Timothy H Bestor
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2009-08-15       Impact factor: 5.285

Review 7.  Notes on the role of dynamic DNA methylation in mammalian development.

Authors:  Timothy H Bestor; John R Edwards; Mathieu Boulard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Function and information content of DNA methylation.

Authors:  Dirk Schübeler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Human lymphoid translocation fragile zones are hypomethylated and have accessible chromatin.

Authors:  Zhengfei Lu; Michael R Lieber; Albert G Tsai; Carolina E Pardo; Markus Müschen; Michael P Kladde; Chih-Lin Hsieh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Genome-wide conserved consensus transcription factor binding motifs are hyper-methylated.

Authors:  Mun-Kit Choy; Mehregan Movassagh; Hock-Guan Goh; Martin R Bennett; Thomas A Down; Roger S Y Foo
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.