Literature DB >> 11312407

Pulmonary infiltrates in non-HIV immunocompromised patients: a diagnostic approach using non-invasive and bronchoscopic procedures.

A Rañó1, C Agustí, P Jimenez, J Angrill, N Benito, C Danés, J González, M Rovira, T Pumarola, A Moreno, A Torres.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The development of pulmonary infiltrates is a frequent life threatening complication in immunocompromised patients, requiring early diagnosis and specific treatment. In the present study non-invasive and bronchoscopic diagnostic techniques were applied in patients with different non-HIV immunocompromised conditions to determine the aetiology of the pulmonary infiltrates and to evaluate the impact of these methods on therapeutic decisions and outcome in this population.
METHODS: The non-invasive diagnostic methods included serological tests, blood antigen detection, and blood, nasopharyngeal wash (NPW), sputum and tracheobronchial aspirate (TBAS) cultures. Bronchoscopic techniques included fibrobronchial aspirate (FBAS), protected specimen brush (PSB), and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL). Two hundred consecutive episodes of pulmonary infiltrates were prospectively evaluated during a 30 month period in 52 solid organ transplant recipients, 53 haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients, 68 patients with haematological malignancies, and 27 patients requiring chronic treatment with corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive drugs.
RESULTS: An aetiological diagnosis was obtained in 162 (81%) of the 200 patients. The aetiology of the pulmonary infiltrates was infectious in 125 (77%) and non-infectious in 37 (23%); 38 (19%) remained undiagnosed. The main infectious aetiologies were bacterial (48/125, 24%), fungal (33/125, 17%), and viral (20/125, 10%), and the most frequent pathogens were Aspergillus fumigatus (n=29), Staphylococcus aureus (n=17), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=12). Among the non-infectious aetiologies, pulmonary oedema (16/37, 43%) and diffuse alveolar haemorrhage (10/37, 27%) were the most common causes. Non-invasive techniques led to the diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates in 41% of the cases in which they were used; specifically, the diagnostic yield of blood cultures was 30/191 (16%); sputum cultures 27/88 (31%); NPW 9/50 (18%); and TBAS 35/55 (65%). Bronchoscopic techniques led to the diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates in 59% of the cases in which they were used: FBAS 16/28 (57%), BAL 68/135 (51%), and PSB 30/125 (24%). The results obtained with the different techniques led to a change in antibiotic treatment in 93 cases (46%). Although changes in treatment did not have an impact on the overall mortality, patients with pulmonary infiltrates of an infectious aetiology in whom the change was made during the first 7 days had a better outcome (29% mortality) than those in whom treatment was changed later (71% mortality; p=0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Non-invasive and bronchoscopic procedures are useful techniques for the diagnosis of pulmonary infiltrates in immunocompromised patients. Bronchial aspirates (FBAS and TBAS) and BAL have the highest diagnostic yield and impact on therapeutic decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11312407      PMCID: PMC1746047          DOI: 10.1136/thorax.56.5.379

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorax        ISSN: 0040-6376            Impact factor:   9.139


  31 in total

Review 1.  A persistent challenge: the diagnosis of respiratory disease in the non-AIDS immunocompromised host.

Authors:  C Mayaud; J Cadranel
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  The lung in the immunocompromised patient. Infectious complications Part 1.

Authors:  R P Baughman
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.580

3.  Microscopic and baceriologic analysis of expectorated sputum.

Authors:  P R Murray; J A Washington
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 4.  The lung in the immunocompromised patient. Infectious complications part 2.

Authors:  M Tamm
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.580

5.  Utility of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in bone marrow transplant patients.

Authors:  P White; J T Bonacum; C B Miller
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.483

6.  Autopsy-controlled prospective evaluation of serial screening for circulating galactomannan by a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for hematological patients at risk for invasive Aspergillosis.

Authors:  J Maertens; J Verhaegen; H Demuynck; P Brock; G Verhoef; P Vandenberghe; J Van Eldere; L Verbist; M Boogaerts
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 7.  Noninfectious lung disease in the immunocompromised host.

Authors:  S W Crawford
Journal:  Respiration       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 3.580

8.  Use of a bronchoscopic protected catheter brush for the diagnosis of pulmonary infections.

Authors:  N W Wimberley; J B Bass; B W Boyd; M B Kirkpatrick; R A Serio; H M Pollock
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Bronchoalveolar lavage in the diagnosis of diffuse pulmonary infiltrates in the immunosuppressed host.

Authors:  D E Stover; M B Zaman; S I Hajdu; M Lange; J Gold; D Armstrong
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 25.391

10.  Pulmonary complications in patients with haematological malignancies treated at a respiratory ICU.

Authors:  S Ewig; A Torres; R Riquelme; M El-Ebiary; M Rovira; E Carreras; A Raño; A Xaubet
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 16.671

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary infiltrates in the immunocompromised: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  D Peckham; M W Elliott
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Diagnostic strategy in cancer patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  Elie Azoulay; Benoît Schlemmer
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-04-29       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 3.  [Pneumonias and immunosuppression].

Authors:  K Dalhoff; J Marxsen; J Steinhoff
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.743

4.  Correlation between sputum and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid cultures.

Authors:  Grégory Dubourg; Cédric Abat; Jean-Marc Rolain; Didier Raoult
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Pneumonia in the neutropenic cancer patient.

Authors:  Scott E Evans; David E Ost
Journal:  Curr Opin Pulm Med       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.155

Review 6.  The utility of bronchoscopy in immunocompromised patients: a review.

Authors:  Christopher Morton; Jonathan Puchalski
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Inflammatory response associated with pulmonary complications in non-HIV immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  C Agustí; A Rañó; M Rovira; X Filella; N Benito; A Moreno; A Torres
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 8.  High-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of lung infections in non-AIDS immunocompromised patients.

Authors:  Tomás Franquet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-14       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Host lung gene expression patterns predict infectious etiology in a mouse model of pneumonia.

Authors:  Scott E Evans; Michael J Tuvim; Jiexin Zhang; Derek T Larson; Cesar D García; Sylvia Martinez-Pro; Kevin R Coombes; Burton F Dickey
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2010-07-23

10.  Use of nasopharyngeal aspirate for diagnosis of pneumocystis pneumonia.

Authors:  Kelvin K W To; Sally C Y Wong; Ting Xu; Rosana W S Poon; Ka-Yi Mok; Jasper F W Chan; Vincent C C Cheng; Kwok-Hung Chan; Ivan F N Hung; Kwok-Yung Yuen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.