Literature DB >> 11311786

Unsupervised learning of granule cell sparse codes enhances cerebellar adaptive control.

N Schweighofer1, K Doya, F Lay.   

Abstract

Marr [J. Physiol. (1969) 202, 437-470] and Albus [Math. Biosci. (1971) 10, 25-61] hypothesized that cerebellar learning is facilitated by a granule cell sparse code, i.e. a neural code in which the fraction of active neurons is low at any one time. In this paper, we re-examine this hypothesis in light of recent experimental and theoretical findings. We argue that cerebellar motor learning is enhanced by a sparse code that simultaneously maximizes information transfer between mossy fibers and granule cells, minimizes redundancies between granule cell discharges, and re-codes the mossy fiber inputs with an adaptive resolution such that inputs corresponding to large errors are finely encoded. We then propose that a set of biologically plausible unsupervised learning rules can produce such a code. To maintain a low mean firing rate compatible with a sparse code, an activity-dependent homeostatic mechanism sets the cells' thresholds. Then, to maximize information transfer, the mossy fiber--granule cell synapses are adjusted by a Hebbian rule. Furthermore, to minimize redundancies between granule cell discharges, the inhibitory Golgi cell--granule cell synapses are tuned by an anti-Hebbian rule. Finally, to allow adaptive resolution, a performance-based neuromodulator-like signal gates these three plastic processes. We integrate these gated learning rules into a simplified model of the cerebellum for arm movement control, and show that unsupervised learning of granule cell sparse codes greatly improves cerebellar adaptive motor control in comparison to a "fixed" Marr--Albus-type model. Until recently, activity-dependent cerebellar plasticity was thought to be largely confined to the granule cell--Purkinje cell synapses. This static view of the cerebellum is, however, quickly being replaced by an extremely dynamic view in which plasticity is omnipresent. The present theoretical study shows how several forms of plasticity in the granular layer of the cerebellum can produce fast, accurate and stable cerebellar learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11311786     DOI: 10.1016/s0306-4522(00)00548-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroscience        ISSN: 0306-4522            Impact factor:   3.590


  30 in total

Review 1.  Distributed Circuit Plasticity: New Clues for the Cerebellar Mechanisms of Learning.

Authors:  Egidio D'Angelo; Lisa Mapelli; Claudia Casellato; Jesus A Garrido; Niceto Luque; Jessica Monaco; Francesca Prestori; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Eduardo Ros
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 2.  Computational models of timing mechanisms in the cerebellar granular layer.

Authors:  Tadashi Yamazaki; Shigeru Tanaka
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 3.847

Review 3.  Sensory-evoked synaptic integration in cerebellar and cerebral cortical neurons.

Authors:  Paul Chadderton; Andreas T Schaefer; Stephen R Williams; Troy W Margrie
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-01-17       Impact factor: 34.870

4.  Optimal Degrees of Synaptic Connectivity.

Authors:  Ashok Litwin-Kumar; Kameron Decker Harris; Richard Axel; Haim Sompolinsky; L F Abbott
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Calcium Channel-Dependent Induction of Long-Term Synaptic Plasticity at Excitatory Golgi Cell Synapses of Cerebellum.

Authors:  F Locatelli; T Soda; I Montagna; S Tritto; L Botta; F Prestori; E D'Angelo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Increased neurotransmitter release during long-term potentiation at mossy fibre-granule cell synapses in rat cerebellum.

Authors:  Elisabetta Sola; Francesca Prestori; Paola Rossi; Vanni Taglietti; Egidio D'Angelo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Gating of long-term potentiation by nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the cerebellum input stage.

Authors:  Francesca Prestori; Claudia Bonardi; Lisa Mapelli; Paola Lombardo; Rianne Goselink; Maria Egle De Stefano; Daniela Gandolfi; Jonathan Mapelli; Daniel Bertrand; Martijn Schonewille; Chris De Zeeuw; Egidio D'Angelo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Re-evaluating Circuit Mechanisms Underlying Pattern Separation.

Authors:  N Alex Cayco-Gajic; R Angus Silver
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 17.173

Review 9.  Electrophysiology of ionotropic GABA receptors.

Authors:  Erwan Sallard; Diane Letourneur; Pascal Legendre
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 9.261

10.  Spike timing regulation on the millisecond scale by distributed synaptic plasticity at the cerebellum input stage: a simulation study.

Authors:  Jesús A Garrido; Eduardo Ros; Egidio D'Angelo
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.