Literature DB >> 11311414

Effects of amount of milk, milk flow and access to a rubber teat on cross-sucking and non-nutritive sucking in dairy calves.

J Jung1, L Lidfors.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test the effects of different amounts of milk, flow rate of milk, and access to a teat after milk intake on non-nutritive sucking on an empty teat and on cross-sucking on other calves in Bos taurus dairy calves. An additional aim was to test if calves prefer to perform non-nutritive sucking on a teat with the taste of milk or on a clean teat. First experiment involved 11 groups of three calves during gradual decrease from 5 to 2.5 and 1 to 0l of whole milk per meal twice daily. Milk flow was either 0.5 or 1l/min, and the teat buckets were either left or removed after milk intake. When the calves were fed with 5l of milk, non-nutritive sucking and cross-sucking decreased (P<0.001), compared to 1 and 2.5l. Removing the empty teat after milk intake increased cross-sucking (P<0.001). Slow milk flow reduced non-nutritive sucking after milk intake (P<0.05), but did not influence cross-sucking. Duration of recorded milk intake was similar with fast flow and 5l of milk, compared to slow flow and 2.5l of milk. The latter combination increased non-nutritive sucking and cross-sucking, suggesting that amount of milk is more important than duration of milk intake.Second experiment was carried out on 12 individually kept calves. The calves received 2.5l of milk either in an open bucket, in a rubber teat bucket, or half/half in both buckets. When not used for feeding, the open bucket and the teat bucket were filled and emptied again to make them 'tasty' with some drops of milk. The tasty teat bucket was either removed or present after milk intake. The calves had always access to a second clean teat bucket. Source of milk had no influence on recorded behaviour after milk intake. The tasty teat was sucked for twice as long as the clean one when both teats were present (P<0.001). When the tasty teat was removed, the calves increased sucking on the clean teat (P<0.001), but decreased total time spent sucking (P<0.001). We conclude that a high amount of milk and the presence of the teat bucket after milk intake reduces cross-sucking, and that a clean teat is less effective in encouraging calves to suck than a teat with taste of milk.

Entities:  

Year:  2001        PMID: 11311414     DOI: 10.1016/s0168-1591(01)00110-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Anim Behav Sci        ISSN: 0168-1591            Impact factor:   2.448


  6 in total

1.  Sucking and drinking behaviour in preweaned dairy calves in the first five weeks of life.

Authors:  Ueli Braun; Manon Kochan; Martin Kaske; Christian Gerspach; Ulrich Bleul
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  A survey of management practices that influence performance and welfare of dairy calves reared in southern Brazil.

Authors:  Maria J Hötzel; Cibele Longo; Lucas F Balcão; Clarissa S Cardoso; João H C Costa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Impacts of self- and cross-sucking on cattle health and performance.

Authors:  Motamed Elsayed Mahmoud; Fatma Ali Mahmoud; Adel Elsayed Ahmed
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2016-09-01

4.  Calves Use an Automated Brush and a Hanging Rope When Pair-Housed.

Authors:  Gosia Zobel; Heather W Neave; Harold V Henderson; James Webster
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW) on a request from the Commission related with the risks of poor welfare in intensive calf farming systems.

Authors: 
Journal:  EFSA J       Date:  2006-06-06

6.  The effect of age when group housed and other management factors on playing and non-nutritive sucking behaviour in dairy calves: a cross sectional observational study.

Authors:  Masja Reipurth; Stephanie Kruuse Klausen; Matthew Denwood; Björn Forkman; Hans Houe
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 1.695

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.