Literature DB >> 11311037

Limitations of the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test as a measure of working memory in patients with multiple sclerosis.

J D Fisk1, C J Archibald.   

Abstract

The Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) is a commonly used procedure that combines elements of both a working memory task and a test of information processing speed. Patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) have consistently been found to be impaired on this test and it has been recommended as a core outcome measure in clinical trials. The standard score for this task is the number of correct responses at each stimulus presentation rate but a concern has been raised that subjects may ignore some test items in order to chunk the information into manageable portions and avoid performing several cognitive tasks simultaneously. To account for this strategy, one can examine the proportion of correct responses that are consecutive (termed dyads), since such responses require that the task be performed according to the instructions. We compared a group of 35 mildly to moderately disabled MS patients and matched healthy controls on the PASAT. The MS patients made significantly fewer correct responses at the 2 slowest presentation rates (2.4, 2.0 s/digit) while their scores at faster rates (1.6, 1.2 s/digit) did not discriminate them from controls as well. Nevertheless, the MS patients' percentage of dyads was significantly lower than that of the control sample across all stimulus presentation rates. While our study supports the use of the PASAT as a test that distinguishes MS patients from healthy individuals, our results also illustrate problems that lie in the interpretation of this difference in performance. It appears that a chunking strategy may be common in the PASAT, particularly as task demands increase, and that this may mask actual performance differences. If so, the total correct response score alone is limited as a measure of working memory and information processing speed. More detailed analyses of PASAT performance, coupled with other measures of information processing, may help clarify the underlying cognitive deficits of MS patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11311037     DOI: 10.1017/s1355617701733103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc        ISSN: 1355-6177            Impact factor:   2.892


  18 in total

1.  Compensatory cortical activation observed by fMRI during a cognitive task at the earliest stage of MS.

Authors:  Bertrand Audoin; Danielle Ibarrola; Jean-Philippe Ranjeva; Sylviane Confort-Gouny; Irina Malikova; André Ali-Chérif; Jean Pelletier; Patrick Cozzone
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  The relationship between processing speed and working memory demand in systemic lupus erythematosus: evidence from a visual n-back task.

Authors:  Janet L Shucard; Wing H Lee; Ashley S Safford; David W Shucard
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Information processing and magnetic resonance imaging indices of brain pathology in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Antonina Omisade; John D Fisk; Raymond M Klein; Matthias Schmidt; Sultan Darvesh; Virender Bhan
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2012

4.  Deconstructing spatial working memory and attention deficits in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Leon Gmeindl; Susan M Courtney
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Binocular low-contrast letter acuity and the symbol digit modalities test improve the ability of the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite to predict disease in pediatric multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Amy T Waldman; Salim Chahin; Amy M Lavery; Geraldine Liu; Brenda L Banwell; Grant T Liu; Laura J Balcer
Journal:  Mult Scler Relat Disord       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.339

6.  Cognitive impairments in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  R S Prakash; E M Snook; J M Lewis; R W Motl; A F Kramer
Journal:  Mult Scler       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 6.312

Review 7.  Neuropsychological impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus: a comparison with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  R H B Benedict; J L Shucard; R Zivadinov; D W Shucard
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 7.444

8.  White matter abnormalities and working memory impairment in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Elizabeth Kozora; David B Arciniegas; Emily Duggan; Sterling West; Mark S Brown; Christopher M Filley
Journal:  Cogn Behav Neurol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 1.600

9.  A Longitudinal Evaluation of Cognitive Fatigue on a Task of Sustained Attention in Early Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.

Authors:  Jason A Berard; Andra M Smith; Lisa A S Walker
Journal:  Int J MS Care       Date:  2018 Mar-Apr

10.  Occupational attainment as a marker of cognitive reserve in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Omar Ghaffar; Marty Fiati; Anthony Feinstein
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.